(updated) Proof Of God: Messengership!
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.philosophy Profile…
 Up
(updated) Proof Of God: Messengership!         


Author: awais.nazir.ch
Date: May 22, 2008 20:57

SECULAR EVIDENCE (THAT GOD EXISTS):

First Assumption: Suppose that all life on Earth came from a single
celled thing which emerged about 4 billion years ago, on Earth.

That single-cell has to meet the following conditions, skipping any of
the following and life couldn't start:

-Nitrogen/Sulphur/etc atoms need to join in equillibrium and in exact
helix shapek, in a single generation. (nearly impossible).

-That proto-DNA need to have a complete reproductive system, in a
single generation. (nearly impossible).

-That proto-DNA need to have a complete system for DNA repair, in a
single generation. (nearly impossible).

-That proto-DNA need to have a complete food-intake-energy-formation
system, in a single generation. (nearly impossible).

-That proto-DNA need to have cell-wall/cytoplasm system, in a single
generation. (nearly impossible).

Second Assumption: Suppose that that proto-DNA some-how came into
existence, don't say how?

-A reasonable beneficial mutation rate is 1/million.
Show full article (5.70Kb)
6 Comments
Re: (updated) Proof Of God: Messengership!         


Author: DanielSan
Date: May 22, 2008 21:07

awais.nazir.ch@gmail.com wrote:
> SECULAR EVIDENCE (THAT GOD EXISTS):
>
>
>
> First Assumption: Suppose that all life on Earth came from a single
> celled thing which emerged about 4 billion years ago, on Earth.

You're wrong right here.
>
> That single-cell has to meet the following conditions, skipping any of
> the following and life couldn't start:
>
> -Nitrogen/Sulphur/etc atoms need to join in equillibrium and in exact
> helix shapek, in a single generation. (nearly impossible).

And here.
>
> -That proto-DNA need to have a complete reproductive system, in a
> single generation. (nearly impossible).

And here.
Show full article (3.70Kb)
no comments
Re: (updated) Proof Of God: Messengership!         


Author: Pop Fly
Date: May 22, 2008 21:23

Proof that not all men evolved from apes: this one's made of straw.

On May 22, 11:57 pm, awais.nazir...@gmail.com wrote:
> SECULAR EVIDENCE (THAT GOD EXISTS):


> RATIONALITY AND SINCERITY MATTERS; NONE ELSE, INCLUDING BIAS.

Correct facts also matter.

Rationality without facts, what does that get you? You'd become a
Doctor of the Roman Catholic Church, like St. Thomas Aquinas.
no comments
Re: (updated) Proof Of God: Messengership!         


Author: raven1
Date: May 22, 2008 22:29

On Thu, 22 May 2008 20:57:35 -0700 (PDT), awais.nazir.ch@gmail.com
wrote:
>All Major Religions teach: Oneness Of God (yes, hindus believe in ONE
>GOD, but many forms of that god)

Many Hindus would beg to differ with that statement.
no comments
Re: (updated) Proof Of God: Messengership!         


Author: Immortalist
Date: May 22, 2008 22:50

On May 22, 8:57 pm, awais.nazir...@gmail.com wrote:
> SECULAR EVIDENCE (THAT GOD EXISTS):
>

A teleological argument, or argument from design, is an argument for
the existence of God or a creator based on (perceived_evidence) of
order, purpose, design, or direction—or some combination of these—in
nature.

1. X is too complex, orderly, adaptive,
apparently purposeful, or beautiful to have
occurred randomly or accidentally.

2. Therefore, X must have been created
by a sentient, intelligent, wise, or
purposeful being.

3. God is that sentient, intelligent,
wise, or purposeful being.

4. Therefore, God exists.

Formal objections and counterarguments

Complexity does not imply design
Show full article (14.00Kb)
no comments
Re: (updated) Proof Of God: Messengership!         


Author: John Smith
Date: May 23, 2008 04:01

gmail.com> wrote in message
news:47da453d-5ba4-413e-be6f-81be1ce512a9@k13g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> SECULAR EVIDENCE (THAT GOD EXISTS):

Warmed over crap is no better than the original.
no comments
Re: (updated) Proof Of God: Messengership!         


Author: El Che
Date: May 23, 2008 16:25

awais.nazir.ch@gmail.com wrote:
> Conclusion:
>
> - nearly-impossible * nearly-impossible * nearly-impossible * nearly-
> impossible * nearly-impossible * nearly-impossible * nearly-impossible
> = Impossible.

ROTFL

--
"Me contó que cuando era presidente del Banco Central había firmado los
billetes con la palabra Che para burlarse, y me dijo que el dinero, fetiche
de mierda, debía ser feo."
Eduardo Galeano - De "Dias y noches de amor y de guerra"
no comments