MY OPINIONS:

Some/many members of British academia had/have voted to exclude
Israeli scholars, based on alleged Israeli
persercution of Palestinians.

Note: I also recently read that this declaration has been rescinded or
moderated or something.

The academics REPORTEDLY previously didn't exclude any other academic
nationals from the World except Israeli.

So, if true, that itself is not what I'd call cricket.

Some of these exclusionary voting academics are British Jews, though
that doesn't cut ice.

So far as a British professor's dissent at an Auschwitz meeting re the
Shoah.

The Red Cross has finally within past year or so been authorized by
all the European countries to release all the reportedly millions of
Holocaust pertaining documents.

From what I've read: The Red Cross is nevetheless stalling, not
releasing its documents in custody:

A Wiki link on Holocaust denial is about as effective as citing carbon
dating to impress a creationist.

There wouldn't be so many Holocaust deniers and conspiracy theorists
running around if the corp. media weren't so busy "merely" omitting
stories and hyping non issues.

That anti-semitism in the U. S. is what caused the NY Times to
"merely" omit the Holocaust at the time it was happening hardly
changes the fact that the people were not informed on that as well as
many other issues 100%% necessary to live in a democracy.

Anyone who expects good results from a democracy of ignorant citizens
is . . .

The only real remedy is the great charter of American freedom and _no_
merely spamming the docket with naked nazi fagburner parade "issues"
is _not_ going to do anything.