MY OPINIONS:
Some/many members of British academia had/have voted to exclude
Israeli scholars, based on alleged Israeli
persercution of Palestinians.
Note: I also recently read that this declaration has been rescinded or
moderated or something.
The academics REPORTEDLY previously didn't exclude any other academic
nationals from the World except Israeli.
So, if true, that itself is not what I'd call cricket.
Some of these exclusionary voting academics are British Jews, though
that doesn't cut ice.
So far as a British professor's dissent at an Auschwitz meeting re the
Shoah.
The Red Cross has finally within past year or so been authorized by
all the European countries to release all the reportedly millions of
Holocaust pertaining documents.
From what I've read: The Red Cross is nevetheless stalling, not
releasing its documents in custody:
Apparently the Red Cross is acting in some bad faith, or why would it
delay?
SOME countries are informally APPARENTLY still covering their
participation/shame/embarrassment.
Perhaps that's something to protest here on the internet and in an
underground.
The documents are APPARENTLY so matter-of-fact yet overwhelming
indicting there are PERHAPS rational fears of angry European uprisings
in reactions.
ALLOW THOSE DAMNE FILES BEFORE THE WORLD, as history now and forever
demands it.
I personally don't mind a maverick professor's dissenting thesis
apparently about the technology(ies) of alleged murder machines.
That's what a good university's reason-to-be is----not production of
well-trained automatons & ameners.
Meanwhile, to those flirting with denialism: Here are some responses
that I accept as true enough.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Holocaust_denial
On Jun 4, 7:49 pm, St Georges Day April 23rd
googlemail.com> wrote:> Dr Nicholas Kollerstrom, a respected astronomer and author, is the
> latest scientist to discover the limits of academic freedom in the
> Western world.
>
> Until recently Dr Kollerstrom was an honorary fellow of University
> College London. His views as a science historian were sought by
> scientific journals and media organisations, such as the BBC in its
> report on new research concerning the planet Neptune.
>
> Yet on 22nd April University College abruptly terminated his
> fellowship, without any consultation or right of appeal. Dr
> Kollerstrom's offence was to have published sceptical views about
> scientific aspects of the Holocaust on the CODOH website, based in
> America. At no time had he promoted these views within University
> College, or done anything to bring the college into disrepute.
>
> The London based Jewish Chronicle duly boasted about Dr Kollerstrom's
> dismissal on the front page of its 25th April edition.
>
> On 7th May Dr Kollerstrom first became acquainted with Lady Renouf to
> seek advice on whether he could expect to travel safely to Germany
> where he hoped to present his paper The Walls of Auschwitz - a review
> of the chemical studies to the Berlin Conference on 15th-18th May.
>
> This conference (Extermination in Gas Chambers in National Socialist
> Concentration and Extermination Camps) was designed to refute the
> revisionists' case on the alleged mass murder weapon - the gas
> chamber.
>
> Lady Renouf advised in her observation that:
>
> a)
> it was unlikely that the organisers would include a revisionist paper
> in their unchallengeable conference (as opposed to the entirely open
> to allcomers Tehran Conference in 2006 on The Holocaust - A Global
> Review). And to prove the case she asked the Berlin Conference
> organisers whether she could be included as press, but received no
> response;
>
> b)
> if Dr Kollerstrom were to open his scientific mouth in Germany, or in
> any of the ten countries where it is illegal to bring forensic science
> in to question the Holocaust legend "in full or in part", he would
> risk certain prosecution and a long term of imprisonment.
>
> About to appear herself on a Press TV live panel discussion Lady
> Renouf suggested to the channel, which at last offers UK viewers a
> democratic choice of information sources, that they interview Dr
> Kollerstrom, who had been persecuted by the mainstream media, thus to
> provide him with some redress for the vilification and libel he has
> recently suffered following his scientific article published on a U.S.
> website.
>
> On 14th May the channel duly filmed an interview with the science
> historian Dr Kollerstrom and a second interview with Lady Renouf, who
> provided the background regarding the stark contrast between the open
> democratic approach she had experienced at the Tehran conference, as
> compared to the tyrannical and closed programme of this year's
> government sponsored Berlin conference, where no revisionist was
> invited - though the conference was supposed to be all about
> revisionists and their (source) criticism.
>
> Kollestrom and Renouf at Press TV
> Dr Nicholas Kollerstrom and Lady Michèle Renouf on set at Press TV
> after recording each of their interviews. Lady Renouf is holding a
> copy of The Rudolf Report
>
> The substance of Dr Kollerstrom's interview is his hope that a
> scientific journal will sponsor his own on site chemical analysis of
> the walls of Auschwitz, in the tradition of the Leuchter Report and
> the Rudolf Report. These authors, like Dr Kollerstrom himself, came to
> this work out of scientific curiosity and with no political interest.
>
> After recording his interview Dr Kollerstrom appeared live on Press
> TV's Between the Headlines 14th May edition - click here for the
> relevant excerpt from the programme featuring presenter Jan Fossgard
> and fellow guest Kate Bevan.
>
> Despite Ms Bevan's earlier hypocritical stance in favour of scepticism
> (during a discussion of Le Monde's recent admission that it had
> misidentified photos supposedly of Hiroshima after the 1945 atomic
> bombing) in her subsequent unthinking mandatory denunciation of
> revisionism one recognises at once the archetypical parroting response
> of the mainstream journalist, confronted by a taboo source-critical
> attitude towards what Jewish historians term the "holy of holies".
>
>
http://www.tellingfilms.co.uk/kollerstrom.htm
>
> Whether it's jews or muslims they are both fascist hysterics with
> irrational dogmas.
