... for every rail company (and there's plenty of them) involved. Or was it a mis-labelled bridge? Who would pick up the bill if a lorry that was 13' 6" tried to go under a bridge that was signed 13' 9" but which was actually 13' 3" due to resurfacing of the road? You would have to find someone ...

...> Or was it a mis-labelled bridge? Who would pick up the bill if a lorry that was 13' 6" tried to go under a bridge that was signed 13' 9" but which was actually 13' 3" due ... 90's. Got resurfaced to prevent flooding and the bridge height wasn't altered. Found out when my 15'1" trailer stood no chance of getting under. -- Conor As a Brit I'd like to thank ...

... up for every rail company (and there's plenty of them) involved. Or was it a mis-labelled bridge? Who would pick up the bill if a lorry that was 13' 6" tried to go under a bridge that was signed 13' 9" but which was actually 13' 3" due to resurfacing of the road? HA or LA and they'd have to ...

...plenty of them) involved. Or was it a mis-labelled bridge? Who would pick up the bill if a lorry that was 13' 6" tried to go under a bridge that was signed 13' 9" but which was actually 13' 3" due to resurfacing of ... local highway authority than some cowboy lorry driver. When they resurfaced a bridge near to me they just knocked a foot off the height to ...

... up for every rail company (and there's plenty of them) involved. Or was it a mis-labelled bridge? Who would pick up the bill if a lorry that was 13' 6" tried to go under a bridge that was signed 13' 9" but which was actually 13' 3" due to resurfacing of the road? You would have to find someone...

... for every rail company (and there's plenty of them) involved. Or was it a mis-labelled bridge? Who would pick up the bill if a lorry that was 13' 6" tried to go under a bridge that was signed 13' 9" but which was actually 13' 3" due to resurfacing of the road? You would have to find someone with responsibility...

... nowadays plus the usual mark up for every rail company (and there's plenty of them) involved. Or was it a mis-labelled bridge? Who would pick up the bill if a lorry that was 13' 6" tried to go under a bridge that was signed 13' 9" but which was actually 13' 3" due to resurfacing of the road?

... will put up wire on that bridge in summer 2006 which never happened...> Of late the pigeons nesting under it and they are increasing in...wire at the side of the Bridge but they said the middle of... made the middle of the bridge increase with even more pigeons ... to the sides of the bridge being no longer there home.... up some wire netting under the bridge which would mean I don't have to worry ...

... put up wire on that bridge in summer 2006 which never ... Of late the pigeons nesting under it and they are increasing ... at the side of the Bridge but they said the middle ...made the middle of the bridge increase with even more pigeons...to the sides of the bridge being no longer there home...up some wire netting under the bridge which would mean I...As it is a railway bridge then one would think this...

... put up wire on that bridge in summer 2006 which never ...Of late the pigeons nesting under it and they are increasing...at the side of the Bridge but they said the middle...of the bridge was not their responsibility "this was in 2006...made the middle of the bridge increase with even more pigeons...to the sides of the bridge being no longer there home...up some wire netting under the bridge which would mean I...