Which is what? Stating obvious facts?

Has anything changed? As early as mid December, I pointed out the
obvious: the jingoistic media ("9/11 changed EEEEVERYthing") would
pump the weakest Democrat in order to dump him after the nomination to
keep the U. S. in Iraq 4 more years.

Scores of Democratic Party officials know of that prediction.

Now everything I predicted is coming true: the jingoistic media is
dumping Obama and hyping nonsense including skewed opinion polls that
"merely omit" the Bradley effect.

My "way" is everyone has free speech on economic issues, a
Jeffersonian-Madisonian concept that frightens Repugs so bad that if
Obama used it he could eliminate the Bradley effect and finish off the
GOP.

I've said it enough times: The whites who don't feel comfortable with
a black president but don't want eternal jihah and tax cuts for the
rich will "split" their vote by giving Pelosi a veto proof majority,
but if Obama wins the converse won't be true. It won't result in
less Democrats being elected to Congress. It will signal that the GOP
is heading the way of the Tory Party in the UK.

Of course, if Obama doesn't deploy free speech on economic issues
against the GOP / jingoistic media then it'll be Hillary by 15%% in
2012.

Every time I accurately predict and expose the guile of the jingoistic
media ("9/11 changed EEEVERYthing") , they lose credibility in the
Democratic Party. At a minimum I can always force the media to come
up with a new M. O. which is like tossing a monkey wrench into the
machinery of the [former] 4th estate.

Taking out the decadent American despotism is like shooting rats in a
barrel.

Bret Cahill