Twerps
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.philosophy Profile…
 Up
Twerps         


Author: Bret Cahill
Date: Jun 29, 2008 22:05

Just as a criminal will always return to the scene of his crime, the
twerps will always return to their poop.

Like a magnet.

Bret Cahill
12 Comments
Re: Twerps         


Author: Immortalist
Date: Jun 29, 2008 22:11

On Jun 29, 10:05 pm, Bret Cahill aol.com> wrote:
> Just as a criminal will always return to the scene of his crime, the
> twerps will always return to their poop.
>
> Like a magnet.
>
> Bret Cahill

False. You are using language like, just as a particular chunk of iron
will always be ballance by a particular weight on a scale when clearly
your position is not deductive.

The problem of induction is the philosophical question of whether
inductive reasoning is valid. That is, what is the justification for
either:
Show full article (1.20Kb)
no comments
Re: Twerps         


Author: eBayer
Date: Jun 29, 2008 22:19

Oh look. A Google poster. With an AOL address. *YAWN*

"Bret Cahill" aol.com> wrote in message
news:5420cef6-b063-4205-a05d-57091730a5e6@q24g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>
> "my brane hertz"
>

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
no comments
Re: Twerps         


Author: Immortalist
Date: Jun 29, 2008 22:25

On Jun 29, 10:19 pm, "eBayer" webtv.net> wrote:
> Oh look. A Google poster. With an AOL address. *YAWN*
>

A Circumstantial ad Hominem is a fallacy in which one attempts to
attack a claim by asserting that the person making the claim is making
it simply out of self interest and or circumstances. In some cases,
this fallacy involves substituting an attack on a person's
circumstances (such as the person's religion, political affiliation,
ethnic background, etc.) instead of and in place of the truth or
falsity of the claim being made.

A Circumstantial ad Hominem is a fallacy because a person's interests
and circumstances have no bearing on the truth or falsity of the claim
being made. While a person's interests will provide them with motives
to support certain claims, the claims stand or fall on their own. It
is also the case that a person's circumstances (religion, political
affiliation, etc.) do not affect the truth or falsity of the claim.
This is made quite clear by the following example: "Bill claims that
1+1=2. But he is a Republican, so his claim is false."

http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/circumstantial-ad-hominem.html
Show full article (1.38Kb)
no comments
Re: Twerps         


Author: Shrikeback
Date: Jun 29, 2008 22:51

On Jun 29, 10:05 pm, Bret Cahill aol.com> wrote:
> Just as a criminal will always return to the scene of his crime, the
> twerps will always return to their poop.
>
> Like a magnet.

Now you are descending to images of coprophilia. Talk
about your bottom fishing.
no comments
Re: Twerps         


Author: Sir Frederick
Date: Jun 30, 2008 02:02

On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 22:05:16 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill aol.com> wrote:
>Just as a criminal will always return to the scene of his crime, the
>twerps will always return to their poop.
>
>Like a magnet.
>
>
>Bret Cahill
>
What are "twerps"?
Please give philosophical basis as well.
no comments
Re: Twerps         


Author: foad
Date: Jun 30, 2008 04:16

gmail.com> wrote in message
news:19c58ae3-e7fd-4cfd-b4d5-79369d414b96@c19g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Jun 29, 10:05 pm, Bret Cahill aol.com> wrote:
> Now you are descending to images of coprophilia.
> Talk about your bottom fishing.

Bottom feeding, shirley.
no comments
Re: Twerps         


Author: zinnic
Date: Jun 30, 2008 07:15

On Jun 30, 4:02 am, Sir Frederick fuzzysys.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 22:05:16 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill aol.com> wrote:
>>Just as a criminal will always return to the scene of his crime, the
>>twerps will always return to their poop.
>
>>Like a magnet.
>
>>Bret Cahill
>
> What are "twerps"?
> Please give philosophical basis as well.

Tut, tut Sir Fred, since Bret's repetitious posts (Hilarious by 15
points) have been shown to be poop, it is soooo obvious who and what
a "twerp" is. :-)
Z
no comments
Re: Twerps         


Author: eBayer
Date: Jun 30, 2008 07:42

Good grief. Another Google-poster.

"Immortalist" yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:6ccddaae-be69-4243-825e-19d71c8f77ad@f24g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 29, 10:19 pm, "eBayer" webtv.net> wrote:
>
> A Circumstantial ad Hominem is a fallacy in which one attempts to
> attack a claim blah blah blah I didn't even read any of the posts
> I'm supposedly responding to blah blah blah off-topic relating
> to nothing at all; I have nothing to say blah blah blah blah blah

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
no comments
Re: Twerps         


Author: foad
Date: Jun 30, 2008 08:11

"eBayer" webtv.net> wrote in message
news:4c453$4868f0e1$14501@news.teranews.com...
> Good grief. Another Google-poster.

Be fair, not everyone can master the intricacies of Web TV.
no comments
1 2