Re: To Sir Brian Fletcher
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: To Sir Brian Fletcher         

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: Testing
Date: Jul 1, 2008 18:35

tsk tsk, that should have been Sri ..... not Sir. :)

he's on fire alrighty ;-)

gmail.com> wrote in message
news:fdd11366-0335-4df3-9e89-4db96e4c290c@f24g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 1, 11:36 pm, "THE BORG" here.com> wrote:
> Have you ever thought of writing a book Sir Brian?

I was thinking of writing a book about the thinking of writing a book.
Still thinking about it:-)

I prefer live interaction, an a number of planes.Everything that could
be meaningful, has already been written.
> You might like to try sitting down at a desk or at a table with a nice
> writing implement and a fresh pad of paper - the pen and paper will help
> you
> "connect" to the truth far better than typing at a keypad.

The connection you speak of happens independantly of expression.
> You may like to endeavor to help ALL humans.

No humans need help. Many just think they do.Im talking of
consciousness development, not feeding the starving (befor the usuall
few attack).

Each person is on a unique path, in a 'location' appropriate to their
development.It is a huge step for one to become aware of this, and to
do so involves confirmation from other sources.
As paradoxical as it sounds, we each get to a stage where we are told
that we dont need to be told...told you it was paradoxical :-)
> Maybe rather than the use only of "self" and "I" - you may like to think
> of
> "we" occasionally in that all humans - past, present, dead or alive are
> connected and irrevocably linked in a kind of human "collective".

Absolutely correct, but relating to interaction 'with' 'group
consciousness'.Not my field or interest.
> Humans may temporarily revere a deity or whoever - but this deity also
> would
> be part of a "collective"..

Actually created by the collective.Illusion is an essential step on
the way to reality.
> there is no life form anywhere who is "alone".

Only biologically and metaphysically speaking. We each are a unique
spiritual identity "with" common links. In it but not of it.
> When humans have progressed sufficiently - as you say - into Gods or
> whoever - you will no longer revere a deity or require someone to "look up
> to".

The process of such 'trancendence' is ongoing and individual.
Thousands of years ago there was the likes of Socrates,just as there
are today , people such as Pol Pot.
> ALL humans will rise or change together.

Not so.
> Thus you may like to help all humans grow and change and become better.

There is no help, as would you describe. Growing takes place
independently
> And if there is a change - it would be for all humans - as all humans are
> linked.
> So the more advanced like you - must not only wait - but also teach those
> who are lesser advanced - so that when all humans reach the advanced level
> than all humans change or evolve together.
> Does this make sense?

Yes , on a romantic level, but not in reality.
> Hope it does.

And that is appreciated.

BOfL
> THE BORG
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!