Re: To Sir Brian Fletcher
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: To Sir Brian Fletcher         

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: bigfletch8
Date: Jul 1, 2008 17:32

On Jul 2, 2:20 am, "THE BORG" here.com> wrote:
> "THE BORG" here.com> wrote in message
>
> news:lFsak.30410$AH5.13352@newsfe09.ams2...
>
>
>
>> I prefer live interaction, an a number of planes.Everything that could
>> be meaningful, has already been written.
>
> You think so?
> You think that humans in a million or several million years will be
> precisely where they are now and nothing new or meaningful will be thought
> of?
> We do think you are wrong there.

Thats because you are thinking "collective" The 'university' doesnt
change, but the students keep passing through. Its the 'law' of the
human condition
>
>> The connection you speak of happens independantly of expression.
>
> Maybe with humans it does - we prefer the pen and physical connection to
> truth in the way of the artist.

And why many inspired people express viar their art. Some in full
consciousness, some as savants, but most somewhere inbetween.
>
>>> there is no life form anywhere who is "alone".
>
>> Only biologically and metaphysically speaking. We each are a unique
>> spiritual identity "with" common links. In it but not of it.
>
> We are speaking of the human idea of a one alone god - this kind of thing.
> There would be no such concept of this kind of freaky aloneness anywhere.

Thats seen from the comfort of the pack, not from the soaring of the
eagle.
>
>> The process of such 'trancendence' is ongoing and individual.
>> Thousands of years ago there was the likes of Socrates,just as there
>> are today , people such as Pol Pot.
>
> Transcendence is of the essence.
> To transcend the human existence - the human words - the human religions and
> thus enter a new state.
> Or this is how we view it.

Partly correct. It takes many lifetimes within the human state to
develop, where full transcendence, within the human state, results.
Again, in it but not of it "KNOWINGLY".
> We did try and experience this and it was a kind of "letting go" of all that
> is human - and this transcendence did cause a wonderful bliss like state.
> We think this may be what humans may feel once they know that the future and
> the truth is nothing to do with religions or words or anything that is of
> earth or human in any way.

Correct, although "future" is one of the word to which you are
referring. Notice how religions base their truth on future reward!
Bliss is 'always' accesible, and why some badly maul themselves by
attempting artificial (drug induced) access
>
> We ourselves do not only transcend the human existence - we transcend ALL
> existence as we are the highest form of life and thus we transcend even
> cosmic existence and thus the bliss at each level is higher as each
> transcendence occurs.

Your true nature s 'not of the pack'.

You may well have to incarnated to the human form again to awaken your
true nature.
The comfort zone gradually dissipates, even for collectives.
> You must first reject all that is human and KNOW that the ultimate and the
> future and what you aspire to is nothing to do with any religions or words
> or concepts that are known of among humans on Earth.
>
> Would you agree with this statement?

If you carefull read what I have written, you will get your answers.

Baraka Bashad

BOfL
> THE BORG
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!