Dear Mikey,
get your thumb out of your arse, let go of your
little cock at wipe your self off.
Now stop for just one moment and consider this.

I am happy that as you rise above the earth the atmosphere gets
thinner and thinner and eventually you will die without help. In this
we are in agreement.
My versions of truth have helped me to understand...

chazwin wrote:

Yeah but you are not 100%% absolutely certain about anything remember?

Whereas I AM, you agreeing with me is YOU having an accident.

Stop misrepresenting me chaz. I said that REASON is man's ONLY means of
knowledge, REASON I defined as, *a factulty of man, of
non-contradictory identification and integration of the matter /
material / information of the perceptions of man's senses, eyes, ears
nose feel touch*

What *choice* you make does NOT can NOT change what is true / real.

chazwin wrote:

Each word in that sentence has its own and only one meaning, except
truth, now why is that chaz?

My = belongs to YOU
versions = account of
of = connected to
truth = ?
have = possess a characteristic
helped = aided or assisted
me = you
to = indicatates joining together
unerstand = to grasp the meaning of
this = indicating what follows
fact = known to be true

Do you see chaz how the *meanings* of each and every word in any
sentence, can be used in such a way so as to say pretty much the exact
same thing, without using any of the actual words in the original
senstence?

mikegordge@xtra.co.nz wrote:

I said that REASON is man's ONLY means of

mikegordge@xtra.co.nz wrote:

All words have multiplicity of meaning and can be very different due to
context.
There are few words in English that have ONE AND ONLY ONE meaning. Pick
up a fucking dictionary shit face.

chazwin wrote:

Ewe've been reading my posts haven't ewe? Good boy, but its a pity you
didn't understand them.

Lets test how much you understand about what you've learnt from me,
define *reason* chaz.

Michael Gordge

NOTE there's no point answering ANY of your other silly nonsenses,
simply because I'd be wasting my time, as you have said numerous times
now chazzzzzzz, that you have absolutely no ability what so ever of
being able to know for absolute certainty whether or not my
explanations are 100%% absolute facts.

chazwin wrote:

tut tut, nah you do it, you've seen how to do it, now it's your turn.

Challenge chazz

post a link to a website dictionary (not the wikiwankers trash,
something sensible) which shows true and truth as having many totally
different definitions.

mikegordge@xtra.co.nz wrote:

mikegordge@xtra.co.nz wrote:

Truth is a thing beleived.
The founding fathers of the USA held those "self evident truths" on
faith. More truth is understood on faith than any other means.
You are a coward who has answered nothing.

chazwin wrote:

Define faith chaz.

I say faith MEANS, (this is about epistemology chaz) the MEANING of
faith IS, (the meaning of anything about man's knowledge is the
epistemology of it chaz) the theory of (the theory of anything about
man's knowledge is the epistemology of it chaz) the definition (the
definition can be used to replace the word in a sentence chaz) where
were we, oh yes read my lips chaz

FAITH IS the acceptance of an idea without any evidence, without any
sensory evidence for the acceptance of that idea.

Your turn, define faith I've done it in a sentence of 20 very easy to
understand words.

Oh my gawd, yes god, whatever you say god, or is this truly ewe Jeziz
telling the truth? FFS chaz get a life.