On Aug 23, 9:32 pm, "Spaceman"
wrote:
> Sue... wrote:
>> On Aug 23, 8:50 pm, "Spaceman"
>> wrote:
>>> Sue... wrote:
>>>> You are in worse shape than Dirk. He think Dennis
>>>> McCarthy doesn't know his own identity well enough
>>>> to bet on it and you think I am supportive of Special
>>>> relativty.
>
>>> You are arguing with me that the speed of light is constant
>>> to all when I say it is not.
>
>> You gave no reference. I did.
>
> I gave proof in this thread,
> You ignored it and proved you are blind
> and also have no clue about physics.
>
>> << where $\epsilon_0$ and $\mu_0$ are physical constants
>> which can be evaluated by performing two simple experiments
>> which involve measuring the force of attraction between
>> two fixed changes and two fixed parallel current carrying
>> wires. According to the relativity principle, these
>> experiments must yield the same values for $\epsilon_0$
>> and $\mu_0$ in all inertial frames. Thus, the speed of
>> light must be the same in all inertial frames. >>
>>
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node108.html>
> You use the word "inertial" instead of "at rest" frames.
> That proves you are clueless.
>
> I will place a lightsource moving at an inertial frame speed of
> 1 mph and an observer heading towards it at an inertial frame
> speed of 1000 miles per second.
You use the word "inertial". Have you proved to
yourself that you are clueless?
> The light source will flash for 1 second.
> The observer moving towards the light will not recieve 1 second worth
> of light and will also gather the info faster than an object that was
> only moving at the same speed as the source placing it in the "at rest"
> frame of the source.
No argument with that but you didn't need the word
"inertial" to say it. The masses of the emitter
and absorber have no influence on the light path.
>
> All "inertial" frames can not see 1 second of light from a source
> that put out 1 second of light.
Your statement had nothing to do with inertia.
Light has no mass so light couples to neither gravity
nor inertia.
All inertial frames can measure the same speed of
light. That speed is independent of emitter and
absorber's speed. It depends on the eps and mu
of the free_space dielectric so is unaffected
by motion of the coupling structrues.
Do you think the speed of sound in water
changes when a submarine moves?
> I am sorry you can not grasp such a simple fact that proves
> you are in fact wrong.
