On Aug 23, 8:08 pm, "Spaceman"
wrote:
> Sue... wrote:
>> On Aug 23, 7:22 pm, "Spaceman"
>> wrote:
>>> Sue... wrote:
>>>> On Aug 23, 5:32 pm, "Spaceman"
>>>> wrote:
>
>>>>> Please provide a physical frame of reference that proves
>>>>> lightspeed is constant to all frames and is not actually relative
>>>>> since you know so much about "physics" and SR.
>
>
>>> LOL
>>> For some reason you must not be reading the part that states...
>>> --------
>>> The concept of free space is an abstraction from nature, a baseline
>>> or reference state, that is unattainable in practice, like the
>>> absolute zero of temperature.
>>> --------
>>> LOL
>
>>> So you have pointed me to an unatainable physical frame.
>
<< Approximately 99%% of the interstellar medium is
composed of interstellar gas, and of its mass, about
75%% is in the form of hydrogen (either molecular or
atomic), with the remaining 25%% as helium. The
interstellar gas consists partly of neutral atoms and
molecules, as well as charged particles, such as ions
and electrons. This gas is extremely dilute, with an
average density of about 1 atom per cubic centimeter.
(For comparison, the air we breathe has a density of
approximately 30,000,000,000,000,000,000 molecules
per cubic centimeter.) Even though the interstellar gas
is very dilute, the amount of matter adds up over the
vast distances between the stars. >>
http://www-ssg.sr.unh.edu/ism/what1.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_space
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Characteristic_impedance_of_vacuum
>
> How do you actually link such irrelevant material to showing
> a physical reference frame only shows me why physics is in such
> bad shape with people like you supporting relativity with
> totally irrelevant garbage.
> Sue,
> You have proven that SR has only brainwashed people like you
> beyond help.
> You simply can not grasp a simple fact like the speed of light
> is relative except to "at rest" frames.
> I feel sorry for you.
> Maybe someday you can learn "real" physics instead of the
> rubber ruler physics you simply worship today.
>
> BTW: I hate to tell you Sue...
> Still no actual physical reference frame has been given
> for lightspeed to be constant for all frames..
> I feel sorry that you are even trying to find such at all.
You are in worse shape than Dirk. He think Dennis
McCarthy doesn't know his own identity well enough
to bet on it and you think I am supportive of Special
relativty.
Please take up ice hockey. When both teams kick your
teeth in you will love it.
If that doesn't work, learn some physics:
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/lectures.html
Sue...
