Hello,

I have found a path to Enlightenment as genuine as that of The
Buddha's, or Jesus Christ's, or Muhammad's, and many others.

But one thing about those paths is that their starting point is in
another culture, in another time.

The new path is for us.

Our path is for the modern era, of science and technology.

I want to prove this to you.

I'm following the steps of the scientific method. Currently I am
developing a revolutionary mathematical hypothesis. As there is no
hypothesis yet, I am not yet on the step of developing an experiment.

So as of right now, on my exploration alone, there is no completed
falsifiable hypothesis and no new experimental evidence to report.

I suspect that if I follow this path alone there may never be any
experimental evidence.

However.

The challenge of blazing a new trail, one that's not far from where
you're at in your life right now,
awaits not just you and me, but everyone.

On Feb 26, 9:00 am, Michael Helland gmail.com> wrote:

On Feb 25, 4:00 pm, Michael Helland gmail.com> wrote:

I could express some doubt as to the fact that those paths are
"genuine", but that's an entirely different matter.

Michael Helland wrote:

[snip crap]

Lead coins are difficult to pass as tender for debts public and
private. The Wicked Witch of the West died for Uncle Al's sins.

Dewey fully intended to trounce Truman, Nixon had a plan to win the
Vietnam War, Hitlery Ramrod Clinton saved America from its Healthcare
Crisis, and Sisyphus is almost there.

You are stupid, a liar, or both.

On Feb 25, 4:16 pm, James Colvier gmail.com> wrote:

On Feb 25, 4:46 pm, Uncle Al hate.spam.net> wrote:

I was thinking more along the lines of a falsifiable mathematical
demonstration of the connection between relative space, time, and
matter and their absolute counterparts.

Michael Helland wrote:

Bullshit. No cat, no cradle.

On Feb 25, 5:38 pm, Uncle Al hate.spam.net> wrote:

It'll be a land mark accomplishment in mathematics and computing, and
some body has to be the first to do it.

The first step will be to program an environment with objects in it
that demonstrate intelligence without using any A.I. code.

That's not even the hard part.

It's pretty common to doubt something like this.

I understand why you have your doubts.

My appeal was to uncommon explorers.

On Feb 25, 3:00 pm, Michael Helland gmail.com> wrote:
[snip nonsense]

So have you studied any actual physics yet?

On Feb 25, 7:38 pm, Eric Gisse gmail.com> wrote:

Physics is a large and complex field of knowledge.

I think a more precise question is:

Have I studied the necessary fields (and sub-fields) one should have
mastered to make the claims I have made?

Eric, that is a terrific question.

I think I could answer your question if I knew which of my claims you
found questionable, and what their corresponding fields and sub-fields
are.

Thanks for the question. Good to hear from you. I hope you're well.