|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: XarxXarx Date: Apr 27, 2008 14:36
> "The history of Western philosophy is often divided into three
> periods: Ancient philosophy, Medieval philosophy, and Modern
> philosophy."
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_philosophy
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval_philosophy
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_philosophy
>
> "Modern Philosophy traditionally begins with Rene Descartes and his
> dictum "I think, therefore I am." In the early seventeenth century the
> bulk of philosophy was dominated by Scholasticism: written by
> theologians and drawing upon Plato, Aristotle, and early Church
> writings. Descartes argued that many predominant Scholastic
> metaphysical doctrines were meaningless or false. In short, he
> proposed to begin philosophy from scratch. In his most important work,
> Meditations on First Philosophy, he attempts just this, over six brief ...
|
| Show full article (3.14Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: turtoniturtoni Date: Apr 27, 2008 15:59
i meant to quote:
"The major figures in philosophy of mind, epistemology, and
metaphysics during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries are
roughly divided into two main groups. The "Rationalists," mostly in
France and Germany, assumed that all knowledge must begin from certain
"innate ideas" in the mind. Major Rationalists were Descartes,
Spinoza, Leibniz, and Nicolas Malebranche. The "Empiricists," by
contrast, held that knowledge must begin with sensory experience.
Major figures in this line of thought are Locke, Berkeley, and Hume.
(These are retrospective categories, for which Kant is largely
responsible; but they are not too inaccurate).
Ethics and political philosophy are usually not subsumed under these
categories, though all these philosophers worked in ethics. In their
own distinctive styles. Other important figures here are Hobbes and
Rousseau.
|
| Show full article (2.95Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: turtoniturtoni Date: Apr 27, 2008 16:09
On Apr 27, 5:37 pm, "Xarx" neoncity.com> wrote:
>> "The history of Western philosophy is often divided into three
>> periods: Ancient philosophy, Medieval philosophy, and Modern
>> philosophy."
>
>
>
>
>> "Modern Philosophy traditionally begins with Rene Descartes and his ...
|
| Show full article (4.08Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: XarxXarx Date: Apr 27, 2008 16:43
> Descartes demonstrated the limitation of the thinking process. "I think
> therefore I must speculate" illustrates this point.
>
> The journey of the awakening consciousness has been described as having...
|
| Show full article (2.54Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: toolytooly Date: Apr 27, 2008 20:45
> "The history of Western philosophy is often divided into three
> periods: Ancient philosophy, Medieval philosophy, and Modern
> philosophy."
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_philosophy
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval_philosophy
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_philosophy
>
> "Modern Philosophy traditionally begins with Rene Descartes and his
> dictum "I think, therefore I am." In the early seventeenth century the
> bulk of philosophy was dominated by Scholasticism: written by
> theologians and drawing upon Plato, Aristotle, and early Church
> writings. Descartes argued that many predominant Scholastic
> metaphysical doctrines were meaningless or false. In short, he
> proposed to begin philosophy from scratch. In his most important work,
> Meditations on First Philosophy, he attempts just this, over six brief ...
|
| Show full article (2.78Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Day BrownDay Brown Date: Apr 27, 2008 22:31
Xarx wrote:
> It would depend how far and wide you are prepared to look - discover - travel
> and journey.
> You may find YOU are ready for the inner journey - but maybe you are more
> mature - you think more - you question more. Many are quite satisfied with
> answers gleaned from only the outer journey - from only religion - or from a
> few beers at the pub and much sex.
>
> Have you ever considered transcending the human experience?
> All you speak and teach and say is to do with the human experience as you
> have no Masters who can teach you otherwise.
> How can humans learn more about things when all they have for their masters
> are other humans?
> Well you had Jesus - and several Gods who walked and talked among you. And
> yet they seemed to give no great teachings of what men really wish to know.
> The deep thoughts and philosophy and answers to all questions.
> If there was or ever had been one great teacher - one great God - one great
> Master - then all the world would willingly follow in harmony and peace and
> bliss.
> And yet all humans have is a motley collection of Gods and stories and ...
|
| Show full article (4.55Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: ZerkonXZerkonX Date: Apr 28, 2008 06:08
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 13:59:25 -0700, turtoni wrote:
> Modern Philosophy
There is no such thing in that all Philosophy was once modern and all
philosophy will become ancient.
"I think, therefore I am." You think, therefore you are. We think,
therefore we are.
I do not always think, therefore I am sometimes. What does not think can
not be unless I think it as such.
"I" is a false center.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: toolytooly Date: Apr 28, 2008 06:46
>i meant to quote:
>
> "The major figures in philosophy of mind, epistemology, and
> metaphysics during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries are
> roughly divided into two main groups. The "Rationalists," mostly in
> France and Germany, assumed that all knowledge must begin from certain
> "innate ideas" in the mind. Major Rationalists were Descartes,
> Spinoza, Leibniz, and Nicolas Malebranche. The "Empiricists," by
> contrast, held that knowledge must begin with sensory experience.
> Major figures in this line of thought are Locke, Berkeley, and Hume.
> (These are retrospective categories, for which Kant is largely
> responsible; but they are not too inaccurate).
>
> Ethics and political philosophy are usually not subsumed under these
> categories, though all these philosophers worked in ethics. In their
> own distinctive styles. Other important figures here are Hobbes and
> Rousseau.
> ...
|
| Show full article (3.97Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|