|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Michael GordgeMichael Gordge Date: Sep 12, 2007 14:50
I see ScottH is scared of being identified as an idiot, whereas in
reality being identified as an idiot and with the proof offered ought
be a message to chack your premises.
Why wont Kantians explain, what does "knowing a carrot in itself"
mean?
WHAT does man gain in his knowledge by knowing a carrot "in itself"
that knowng the carrot from outside of itself, doesn't tell him?
Why wont Kantians explain WHY they need to "know a carrot in itself"
to know with 100%% certainty that the carrot is not an elephant in
itself and vice versa?
Michael Gordge
|
| |
|
| | 22 Comments |
|
|
Author: brian fletcherbrian fletcher Date: Sep 12, 2007 15:55
>
> I see ScottH is scared of being identified as an idiot, whereas in
> reality being identified as an idiot and with the proof offered ought
> be a message to chack your premises.
>
> Why wont Kantians explain, what does "knowing a carrot in itself"
> mean?
>
> WHAT does man gain in his knowledge by knowing a carrot "in itself"
> that knowng the carrot from outside of itself, doesn't tell him?
>
> Why wont Kantians explain WHY they need to "know a carrot in itself"
> to know with 100%% certainty that the carrot is not an elephant in
> itself and vice versa?
>
>
> Michael Gordge
|
| Show full article (0.74Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: ImmortalistImmortalist Date: Sep 12, 2007 21:28
On Sep 12, 2:50 pm, Michael Gordge xtra.co.nz> wrote:> I see ScottH is scared of being identified as an idiot, whereas in
> reality being identified as an idiot and with the proof offered ought
> be a message to chack your premises.
>
> Why wont Kantians explain, what does "knowing a carrot in itself"
> mean?
>
> WHAT does man gain in his knowledge by knowing a carrot "in itself"
> that knowng the carrot from outside of itself, doesn't tell him?
>
> Why wont Kantians explain WHY they need to "know a carrot in itself"
> to know with 100%% certainty that the carrot is not an elephant in
> itself and vice versa?
>
> Michael Gordge
|
| Show full article (3.84Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: chazwinchazwin Date: Sep 13, 2007 00:18
On Sep 12, 10:50 pm, Michael Gordge xtra.co.nz> wrote:> I see ScottH is scared of being identified as an idiot, whereas in
> reality being identified as an idiot and with the proof offered ought
> be a message to chack your premises.
>
> Why wont Kantians explain, what does "knowing a carrot in itself"
> mean?
>
> WHAT does man gain in his knowledge by knowing a carrot "in itself"
> that knowng the carrot from outside of itself, doesn't tell him?
>
> Why wont Kantians explain WHY they need to "know a carrot in itself"
> to know with 100%% certainty that the carrot is not an elephant in
> itself and vice versa?
>
> Michael Gordge
|
| Show full article (0.90Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Michael GordgeMichael Gordge Date: Sep 13, 2007 00:55
On Sep 13, 4:18 pm, chazwin yahoo.com> wrote:
> Kant
> points out that we can only know a point of view of a carrot.
Oh really? Which point?
MG
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Michael GordgeMichael Gordge Date: Sep 13, 2007 02:11
On Sep 13, 1:28 pm, Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> If my hand is heated and yours is chilled,
Then you'd settle the problem with a thermometer.
MG
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Michael GordgeMichael Gordge Date: Sep 13, 2007 02:11
On Sep 13, 7:55 am, "brian fletcher" bigpond.net.au> wrote:>> I see ScottH is scared of being identified as an idiot, whereas in
>> reality being identified as an idiot and with the proof offered ought
>> be a message to chack your premises.
>
>> Why wont Kantians explain, what does "knowing a carrot in itself"
>> mean?
>
>> WHAT does man gain in his knowledge by knowing a carrot "in itself"
>> that knowng the carrot from outside of itself, doesn't tell him? ...
|
| Show full article (0.93Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: brian fletcherbrian fletcher Date: Sep 13, 2007 06:08
> On Sep 13, 7:55 am, "brian fletcher" bigpond.net.au> wrote:>>> I see ScottH is scared of being identified as an idiot, whereas in
>>> reality being identified as an idiot and with the proof offered ought
>>> be a message to chack your premises.
>>
>>> Why wont Kantians explain, what does "knowing a carrot in itself"
>>> mean?
>> ...
|
| Show full article (1.24Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Michael GordgeMichael Gordge Date: Sep 13, 2007 13:26
On Sep 13, 10:08 pm, "brian fletcher" bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> however is there an answer that will satisfy you?
Yes the rational ones.
Read chazzzzz'z answer, what fucking "point of view" does man NOT have
of a carrot, that stops him from claiming with 100%% certain knowledge,
that the carrot's not a fornicating fucking humping helephant?
Note how chazzzzz and the Kantians typically gloat over their own
stupidity and ignorance. They gloat and ridicule, rather than even
attempt explain rationally anything they themselves obviously do NOT
understand.
They gloat, that if you dont understand Kant, then is not Kant that's
stupid, its the people who cant understand the dopey khunt Kant.
Why doesn't chazzzz explain the *point* of knowing past the points of
a carrot, that chazzzzz reckons, Kant is saying that man can only know
a carrot up to a point?
WHAT fucking point? what fucking point does man "know of a carrot
_out_of itsefl" up to, but chazzz wont say, why?
|
| Show full article (1.18Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: brian fletcherbrian fletcher Date: Sep 13, 2007 16:24
> On Sep 13, 10:08 pm, "brian fletcher" bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>>> however is there an answer that will satisfy you?
>
> Yes the rational ones.
>
> Read chazzzzz'z answer, what fucking "point of view" does man NOT have
> of a carrot, that stops him from claiming with 100%% certain knowledge,
> that the carrot's not a fornicating fucking humping helephant?
So you know what the answer is not, and yet you keep asking.
>
> Note how chazzzzz and the Kantians typically gloat over their own
> stupidity and ignorance. They gloat and ridicule, rather than even
> attempt explain rationally anything they themselves obviously do NOT
> understand.
So why keep asking/taunting?
|
| Show full article (1.65Kb) |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
