|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Joseph LittleshoesJoseph Littleshoes Date: Apr 8, 2008 11:41
Wizard Of Odds wrote:
>
>
> "Joseph Littleshoes" wrote:
>
>> Wizard Of Odds wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Virgil" wrote:
>>>> "Wizard Of Odds" wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> I'll still consider the possibility
>...
|
| Show full article (4.31Kb) |
|
| | 22 Comments |
|
|
Author: ImmortalistImmortalist Date: Apr 8, 2008 17:18
On Apr 8, 11:41 am, Joseph Littleshoes isp.com> wrote:> Wizard Of Odds wrote:
>
>> "Joseph Littleshoes" wrote:
>
>>> Wizard Of Odds wrote:
>
>>>> "Virgil" wrote:
>>>>> "Wizard Of Odds" wrote:
>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> I'll still consider the possibility
>
>>>>>> What possibility?
>
>>>>> Does Wiz claim to know of any impossibility?
>
>>>> Virgil is still trying to argue for possibility based on lack of
>>>> disproof?? Tsk tsk. That is just more of the same old lame old
>>>> theist argument from ignorance. ...
|
| Show full article (8.81Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Joseph LittleshoesJoseph Littleshoes Date: Apr 8, 2008 19:24
Immortalist wrote:
> On Apr 8, 11:41�am, Joseph Littleshoes isp.com> wrote:
> >>I am aware that some religions have done this, in the past, some still
>>do in certain areas of the world today, and i find this as objectionable
>>as any atheist would.
>>--
>>JL-
>
>
> What if religious behavior is an instinctual hardwired drive. Like and
> Ape behavior? Would the atheist make his own impulses illegal? eeee,
> eeee, oooo, oooo, ahhahh..
Ohh...ahhhh....the mark of a good writer, it takes more than a few
seconds to read you and any attempt at understanding is going to require
more than a flippant one liner to dismiss an obvious superficiality, ala
the resident ilk.
|
| Show full article (5.51Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: Apr 8, 2008 18:14
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 17:18:19 -0700 (PDT), Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Apr 8, 11:41 am, Joseph Littleshoes isp.com> wrote:>> Wizard Of Odds wrote:
>>
>>> "Joseph Littleshoes" wrote:
>>
>>>> Wizard Of Odds wrote:
>>
>>>>> "Virgil" wrote:
>>>>>> "Wizard...
|
| Show full article (7.56Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: thomas p.thomas p. Date: Apr 9, 2008 07:57
"Joseph Littleshoes" isp.com> skrev i en meddelelse
news:47FBBC68.3000109@isp.com...> Wizard Of Odds wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> "Joseph Littleshoes" wrote:
>>> Wizard Of Odds wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Virgil" wrote:
>>>>> "Wizard Of Odds" wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> I'll still consider the possibility
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> What possibility?
>>>>>
>>>>> ...
|
| Show full article (4.69Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Rudy CanozaRudy Canoza Date: Apr 9, 2008 08:15
Joseph Littleshoes wrote:
> Wizard Of Odds wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> "Joseph Littleshoes" wrote:
>>> Wizard Of Odds wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Virgil" wrote:
>>>>> "Wizard Of Odds" wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> I'll still consider the possibility
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> What possibility?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Does Wiz claim to know of any impossibility? ...
|
| Show full article (1.76Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Joseph LittleshoesJoseph Littleshoes Date: Apr 9, 2008 10:35
The Rude Monkey furiously typed:
> Joseph Littleshoes wrote:
>> Seems to me you toss out art and music and literature and anything
>> creative with an insistence on "logically satisfactory evidence"
>
> How do you get that, little joey? Art and music and literature don't
> require any form of belief.
Well you think you can write and expect us to believe that!
--
JL
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Rudy CanozaRudy Canoza Date: Apr 9, 2008 10:50
Joseph Littleshoes wrote:
> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>> Joseph Littleshoes wrote:
>>> Seems to me you toss out art and music and literature and anything
>>> creative with an insistence on "logically satisfactory evidence"
>>
>> How do you get that, little joey? Art and music and literature don't
>> require any form of belief.
>
> Well you think you can write and expect us to believe that!
little joey, you wrote a nonsense, that's all. The previous poster,
whose comments you now scurrilously have edited out, was talking about
beliefs being held that are not based on logically satisfactory
evidence, when the nature of the beliefs is that they ought to be so
based. Art, music and literature don't require any sort of belief at
all; there is nothing inherent in aesthetic appreciation that evidence
of any sort. So, you wrote a nonsense. If you had any integrity, you'd
simply acknowledge that fact, even if only silently to yourself, and
then move on. But you can't.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Joseph LittleshoesJoseph Littleshoes Date: Apr 9, 2008 11:31
Rudy Canoza wrote:
> Joseph Littleshoes wrote:
>> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>> Joseph Littleshoes wrote:
>>>> Seems to me you toss out art and music and literature and anything
>>>> creative with an insistence on "logically satisfactory evidence"
>>>
>>> How do you get that, little joey? Art and music and literature don't
>>> require any form of belief.
>>
>> Well you think you can write and expect us to believe that!
>
> little joey, you wrote a nonsense, that's all. The previous poster,
> whose comments you now scurrilously have edited out, was talking about
> beliefs being held that are not based on logically satisfactory
> evidence, when the nature of the beliefs is that they ought to be so
> based. Art, music and literature don't require any sort of belief at
> all; there is nothing inherent in aesthetic appreciation that evidence
> of any sort. So, you wrote a nonsense. If you had any integrity, you'd
> simply acknowledge that fact, even if only silently to yourself, and ...
|
| Show full article (2.18Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
