Creationists have engaged in such disgraceful behaviour over the decades.
They've been thrown out of the courts twice already and they are bitter
about the experience. They've become so delusional that they actually think
that they can blow smoke up our asses by inventing differant schools of
thought for their outlook. They actually think it's 'scientific' to have
'alternative' points of views presented to students. It only goes to show
what happens when we let 'soft' scientists define for the rest of us what is
science. What nobody seems to realize is that science is defined by HARD
scientists like myself. Evolution is a fact, if for no other reason, it is
a matter of will that we should evolve ourselves. The desire to create
rather than to destroy could serve as a subordinate role...

In article <4sqdnScnELJsHiXVnZ2dnUVZ_trinZ2d@giganews.com>, kmurphy004
@comcast.net says...

Hardly an appropriate the way to resolve truth. Galileo in court lost
his argument. Does that show that copernicus views were wrong?
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

On 30-Aug-2008, SolomonW noaddress.com > wrote:

They lose the court fight and then they respond to the media by saying,"It's
because we're 'human' that we lost.". At some point in all this I obliged
to believe that the reason why I am not God is because I am more important
than God and I think that resolves truth well enough from God's point of
view.