George Hammmond wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:06:33 -0500, John J
> wrote:
>
>
>>doug wrote:
>>
>>Doug is George Hammond who ...
>>
>>
>>>My PhD is not up for your discussion. The fact is that you do
>>>not understand science. The nonsense below proves that:
>>
>>is not even smart enough to follow his own fake threads.
>>
>
> [Hammond]
> Na...Doug thinks he's George Hammond...
Oh god no!!!
. he's not...
Thank goodness, I thought I was in real trouble there.
he's
> too stupid to be able to get my attention... I've got him
> killfiled. He claims he's a PhD in Physics which he
> obviously isn't...
Your jealousy is showing. I have one and you do not.
he isn't intelligent enough... probably
> has a PhD in some lame brain field like "ocean physics" or
> "ecology physics" .. he's a "techn-nerd"... he's only
> posting here because he's a mentally disturbed
> psycho-wannabee and is jealous of me.
I am just thankful I am not you.
He's worthless, but
> far too boring for me to listen to.
You always reply though.
There are shitloads of
> "PhD's" just like him following me around...because they
> know I know something relevant to their mental problem....
> too bad they aren't smart enough to figure out the only way
> to get my attention is to say something on-topic....
You do not consider pointing out your mistakes to be on topic.
they
> certainly aren't capable of insulting me....
We are not insulting you, just telling you that your "proof"
is totally nonsense.
not only am I
> more intellgient,
Really intelligent people know how to spell it.
more educated and more acccomplished ..,.
> I'm also 20 years older for chrissakes.
So you are 90 years old?
For a laugh, read the following:
