|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: whyzardwhyzard Date: Aug 26, 2008 11:17
because none of us have read it
because it is in chinese
just like freud only makes sense in latin and german and in light of
historical reflections
or nietzsche only makes sense if you're drunk
or the i ching only if you're using the coins
or this poem only if you give me money
not much money
just enough to understand that if i don't get a donation soon i'm
going to drag this poem for another 10 or 20 or 30 more paragraphs
making more and more angry lines
give me money now
right now
send to:
Give Me Money
14535 Give Me Money Street
Money City, MN 24123
|
| |
|
| | 12 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Langevinger66Langevinger66 Date: Aug 26, 2008 11:33
On 26 aug, 20:17, whyz...@ mail.com wrote:
> because none of us have read it
> because it is in chinese
> just like freud only makes sense in latin and german and in light of
> historical reflections
> or nietzsche only makes sense if you're drunk
> or the i ching only if you're using the coins
> or this poem only if you give me money
> not much money
> just enough to understand that if i don't get a donation soon i'm
> going to drag this poem for another 10 or 20 or 30 more paragraphs
> making more and more angry lines
> give me money now
> right now
>
> send to:
>
> Give Me Money
> 14535 Give Me Money Street
> Money City, MN 24123 ...
|
| Show full article (0.68Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: ShrikebackShrikeback Date: Aug 26, 2008 13:36
On Aug 26, 11:17Â am, whyz...@ mail.com wrote:
> because none of us have read it
> because it is in chinese
> just like freud only makes sense in latin and german and in light of
> historical reflections
> or nietzsche only makes sense if you're drunk
> or the i ching only if you're using the coins
> or this poem only if you give me money
> not much money
> just enough to understand that if i don't get a donation soon i'm
> going to drag this poem for another 10 or 20 or 30 more paragraphs
> making more and more angry lines
> give me money now
> right now
>
> send to:
>
> Give Me Money
> 14535 Give Me Money Street
> Money City, MN 24123 ...
|
| Show full article (0.79Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Langevinger66Langevinger66 Date: Aug 26, 2008 21:45
On 26 aug, 22:36, Shrikeb...@ gmail.com wrote:
> On Aug 26, 11:17Â am, whyz...@ mail.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> because none of us have read it
>> because it is in chinese
>> just like freud only makes sense in latin and german and in light of
>> historical reflections
>> or nietzsche only makes sense if you're drunk
>> or the i ching only if you're using the coins
>> or this poem only if you give me money
>> not much money
>> just enough to understand that if i don't get a donation soon i'm
>> going to drag this poem for another 10 or 20 or 30 more paragraphs
>> making more and more angry lines
>> give me money now
>> right now ...
|
| Show full article (1.06Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: socratussocratus Date: Aug 27, 2008 07:32
"The Tao that can be told is not the true Tao."
Why?
Because, the TAO was explained without
the physical laws and formulas.
===============================
ATHEISM = RELIGION.
Is atheism a religion? Of course a religion.
Look, how I explain this with physical formulas and laws.
========
THE GENESIS.
1.
T = 0K.
2.
C/D=pi , E=Mc^2, R/N=k , h = 0 , i^2=-1 .
3.
h = 1, c=1. ( light quanta).
4.
h = h /2pi , c>1.
E = hw, e^2 = hca ( electron).
The Lorentz transformations. ...
|
| Show full article (1.20Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: bigfletch8bigfletch8 Date: Aug 27, 2008 08:38
On Aug 28, 12:32Â am, socratus bezeqint.net> wrote:
> "The Tao that can be told is not the true Tao."
> Why?
> Because, the TAO was explained without
> Â the physical laws and formulas.
> ===============================
> ATHEISM = RELIGION.
> Is atheism a religion? Of course a religion.
> Look, how I explain this with physical formulas and laws.
> ========
> THE GENESIS.
> 1.
> Â Â Â T = 0K.
> 2.
> Â Â C/D=pi , Â E=Mc^2, R/N=k , Â h = 0 , i^2=-1 .
> 3.
> Â Â Â h = 1, c=1. ( light quanta).
> 4.
> Â Â Â Â h = h /2pi , Â c>1.
>     E = hw,  e^2 = hca  ( electron). ...
|
| Show full article (1.73Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: wanderriverwanderriver Date: Aug 27, 2008 08:43
On Aug 27, 11:38�am, "bigflet...@ gmail.com" gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Aug 28, 12:32�am, socratus bezeqint.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> "The Tao that can be told is not the true Tao."
>> Why?
>> Because, the TAO was explained without
>> �the physical laws and formulas.
>> ===============================
>> ATHEISM = RELIGION.
>> Is atheism a religion? Of course a religion.
>> Look, how I explain this with physical formulas and laws.
>> ========
>> THE GENESIS.
>> 1.
>> � � �T = 0K. ...
|
| Show full article (2.41Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: bigfletch8bigfletch8 Date: Aug 29, 2008 00:48
On Aug 28, 1:43Â am, wanderriver hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 27, 11:38 am, "bigflet...@ gmail.com" gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Aug 28, 12:32 am, socratus bezeqint.net> wrote:
>
>>> "The Tao that can be told is not the true Tao."
>>> Why?
>>> Because, the TAO was explained without
>>> the physical laws and formulas.
>>> ===============================
>>> ATHEISM = RELIGION.
>>> Is atheism a religion? Of course a religion.
>>> Look, how I explain this with physical formulas and laws.
>>> ========
>>> THE GENESIS. ...
|
| Show full article (2.61Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: wanderriverwanderriver Date: Aug 29, 2008 05:37
On Aug 29, 3:48�am, "bigflet...@ gmail.com" gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Aug 28, 1:43�am, wanderriver hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Aug 27, 11:38 am, "bigflet...@ gmail.com" gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>
>>> On Aug 28, 12:32 am, socratus bezeqint.net> wrote:
>
>>>> "The Tao that can be told is not the true Tao."
>>>> Why?
>>>> Because, the TAO was explained without
>>>> the physical laws and formulas.
>>>> ===============================
>>>> ATHEISM = RELIGION.
>>>> Is atheism a religion? Of course a religion. ...
|
| Show full article (2.64Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: bigfletch8bigfletch8 Date: Aug 29, 2008 08:57
On Aug 29, 10:37Â pm, wanderriver hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 29, 3:48 am, "bigflet...@ gmail.com" gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Aug 28, 1:43 am, wanderriver hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> On Aug 27, 11:38 am, "bigflet...@ gmail.com" gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>
>>>> On Aug 28, 12:32 am, socratus bezeqint.net> wrote:
>
>>>>> "The Tao that can be told is not the true Tao."
>>>>> Why?
>>>>> Because, the TAO was explained without
>>>>> the physical laws and formulas.
>>>>> =============================== ...
|
| Show full article (3.43Kb) |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
  |
|
|
|
|
|