On Aug 31, 9:26Â pm, Bret Cahill
aol.com> wrote:>> Looks like I could be proven wrong when I said there was no
>> censorship in the United Snakes.
>
> You are wrong about more than that.
On a few occassions. But as our friend the Mad
Teuton put it: "One error of a great man is worth
a thousand self-evident truths from a small man."
> You were wrong thinking you could ingratiate yourself to the corp.
> media. Â
I was? And you were wrong thinking you could read
people's minds. Go back to L. Ron Hubbard and
practice projecting microwage beams into the psychoplasm.
You Age of Aquarium Sixties Leftard squishy-headed
types. Always thinking your psychic at the drop of a Che
Beret.
> They'll bottom fish when necessary but that hardly adds to
> their respect for you.
I guess. They do a lot of bottom fishing for sixties leftards.
> They'll always think you are ignorant trailer park trash.
I doubt if they think about me at all. I'm not as paranoid
and grandiose as your average AOL user, I guess. Do
all of them believe that just because they've figgered out
how to post to Usenet, they're famous?
AOL: because 50 million former users couldn't all be
idiots, could they?
> And you were wrong hoping to have the corp. media on your side, if
> possible, would help the gun nut cause. Â The corp. media now have an
> approval rating below Cheney's.
Does that mean it's almost as low as the approval ratings of
the Pelosi Congress? Do tell.
> How nutters always manage to be such chronic political losers is why
> the Secret Service is asking for backup.
Did they ever ask Ayers if he thought McVeigh "did enough"
for free speech for the working class?
