|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Sir FrederickSir Frederick Date: Jul 1, 2008 08:57
The sin is category error, to be so
stupid as to consider the personal brain
based virtual reality as reality. The human
condition is based on deceit, self and otherwise.
The anachronisms strike again! Story vs. story!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=27282
The Wars of Religion Return
by Patrick J. Buchanan
Posted: 07/01/2008
Last week's clash between Dr. James Dobson and Barack Obama is but the latest skirmish in a war that dates back to the time of
Christ. At issue: What is Christian truth? Does the true Christian put social peace ahead of his duty to make God's Law man's law?
In a speech in June 2006, Obama, citing the Book of Leviticus, which declares homosexuality an abomination, noted that Leviticus
also says the eating of shellfish is an abomination and condones slavery.
Moreover, Jesus' Sermon on the Mount is "a passage so radical that it's doubtful that our own Defense Department would survive its
application."
"Folks haven't been reading their Bibles," said Obama.
"Even ... if we expelled every non-Christian from the United States ... whose Christianity would we teach in the schools? Would we
go with James Dobson's or with Al Sharpton's?"
|
| Show full article (5.49Kb) |
|
| | 5 Comments |
|
  |
Author: turtoniturtoni Date: Jul 1, 2008 09:44
On Jul 1, 11:57 am, Sir Frederick fuzzysys.com> wrote:
> The sin is category error, to be so
> stupid as to consider the personal brain
> based virtual reality as reality. The human
> condition is based on deceit, self and otherwise.
> The anachronisms strike again! Story vs. story!
Even the very notion of "free will" could be a deceit.
Other stories:
"A compatibilist, or soft determinist, in contrast, will define a free
act in a way that does not hinge on causal necessitation. For them, an
act is free unless it involves compulsion by another person. Since the
physical universe and the laws of nature are not persons, they argue
that it is a category error to speak of our actions being forced on us
by the laws of nature, and therefore it is wrong to conclude that
universal determinism would mean we are never free."
|
| Show full article (6.23Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: ShrikebackShrikeback Date: Jul 1, 2008 09:48
On Jul 1, 9:44 am, turtoni fastmail.net> wrote:
> On Jul 1, 11:57 am, Sir Frederick fuzzysys.com> wrote:
>
>> The sin is category error, to be so
>> stupid as to consider the personal brain
>> based virtual reality as reality. The human
>> condition is based on deceit, self and otherwise.
>> The anachronisms strike again! Story vs. story!
>
> Even the very notion of "free will" could be a deceit.
>
> Other stories:
>
> "A compatibilist, or soft determinist, in contrast, will define a free
> act in a way that does not hinge on causal necessitation. For them, an
> act is free unless it involves compulsion by another person. Since the
> physical universe and the laws of nature are not persons, they argue
> that it is a category error to speak of our actions being forced on us
> by the laws of nature, and therefore it is wrong to conclude that
> universal determinism would mean we are never free." ...
|
| Show full article (1.12Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: TestingTesting Date: Jul 1, 2008 18:30
"Sir Frederick" fuzzysys.com> wrote in message
news:n5kk64dk1ropsbc75jcglbfe9nlsgp76vb@4ax.com...
> The sin is category error, to be so
> stupid as to consider the personal brain
> based virtual reality as reality. The human
> condition is based on deceit, self and otherwise.
> The anachronisms strike again! Story vs. story!
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=27282
> The Wars of Religion Return
> by Patrick J. Buchanan
> Posted: 07/01/2008
>
> Last week's clash between Dr. James Dobson and Barack Obama is but the
> latest skirmish in a war that dates back to the time of
> Christ. At issue: What is Christian truth? Does the true Christian put
> social peace ahead of his duty to make God's Law man's law?
>
> In a speech in June 2006, Obama, citing the Book of Leviticus, which ...
|
| Show full article (3.82Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: bigfletch8bigfletch8 Date: Jul 2, 2008 16:56
On Jul 2, 1:57 am, Sir Frederick fuzzysys.com> wrote:
> The sin is category error, to be so
> stupid as to consider the personal brain
> based virtual reality as reality. The human
> condition is based on deceit, self and otherwise.
> The anachronisms strike again! Story vs. story!
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=27282
> The Wars of Religion Return
> by Patrick J. Buchanan
> Posted: 07/01/2008
>
> Last week's clash between Dr. James Dobson and Barack Obama is but the latest skirmish in a war that dates back to the time of
> Christ. At issue: What is Christian truth? Does the true Christian put social peace ahead of his duty to make God's Law man's law?
>
> In a speech in June 2006, Obama, citing the Book of Leviticus, which declares homosexuality an abomination, noted that Leviticus
> also says the eating of shellfish is an abomination and condones slavery.
>
> Moreover, Jesus' Sermon on the Mount is "a passage so radical that it's doubtful that our own Defense Department would survive its ...
|
| Show full article (6.03Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: bigfletch8bigfletch8 Date: Jul 2, 2008 17:16
On Jul 2, 2:44 am, turtoni fastmail.net> wrote:
> On Jul 1, 11:57 am, Sir Frederick fuzzysys.com> wrote:
>
>> The sin is category error, to be so
>> stupid as to consider the personal brain
>> based virtual reality as reality. The human
>> condition is based on deceit, self and otherwise.
>> The anachronisms strike again! Story vs. story!
>
> Even the very notion of "free will" could be a deceit.
>
> Other stories:
>
> "A compatibilist, or soft determinist, in contrast, will define a free
> act in a way that does not hinge on causal necessitation. For them, an
> act is free unless it involves compulsion by another person.
|
| Show full article (1.33Kb) |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
  |
|
|
|