|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Bret CahillBret Cahill Date: Aug 24, 2008 19:57
If you are saintly like me then the public record is your friend.
On the other hand, if you are a delusional liar, then the public
record is your enemy.
Bret Cahill
|
| |
|
| | 20 Comments |
|
|
Author: Bret CahillBret Cahill Date: Aug 26, 2008 09:27
Just as the criminal exposes himself by returning to the scene of the
crime . . .
> Yeah, we are in awe of his accomplishments. We don't actually know of
> any,
You need to get something peer reviewed by authorities other than sock
puppets. Otherwise everyone will think you are pretending more than
a small child.
But if you actually send something to a tech magazine, for God's sake,
don't mention _my_ name.
> but we take his word for it that they are many and magnificent.
The record does not reflect that I mentioned anything magnificent by
anyone.
Like I said, if you are delusional, the record ain't yer friend.
Bret Cahill
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Bret CahillBret Cahill Date: Aug 26, 2008 09:29
>> On the other hand, if you are a delusional liar, then the public
>> record is your enemy.
> You're so right. �Who could doubt any of what you say? �Thanks for
> enlightening us.
"In the land of the blind delusionals the one eyed man is king."
|
| |
| 3 Comments |
|
|
Author: John LarkinJohn Larkin Date: Aug 26, 2008 09:49
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 09:27:28 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill
aol.com> wrote:
>Just as the criminal exposes himself by returning to the scene of the
>crime . . .
>
>> Yeah, we are in awe of his accomplishments. We don't actually know of
>> any,
>
>You need to get something peer reviewed by authorities other than sock
>puppets. Otherwise everyone will think you are pretending more than
>a small child.
I don't need peer reviewers; I have customers.
>
>But if you actually send something to a tech magazine, for God's sake,
>don't mention _my_ name.
It never occurred to me.
John
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Bret CahillBret Cahill Date: Aug 26, 2008 10:24
> but we take his word for it that they are many and magnificent.
The record does not reflect that I mentioned anything magnificent by
anyone.
Like I said, if you are delusional, the record ain't yer friend.
..........
>>Just as the criminal exposes himself by returning to the scene of the
>>crime . . .
>>> Yeah, we are in awe of his accomplishments. We don't actually know of
>>> any,
>>You need to get something peer reviewed by authorities other than sock
>>puppets. � Otherwise everyone will think you are pretending more than
>>a small child.
> I don't need peer reviewers;
Almost all who are active in industry will eventually end up
publishing _something_ as a byproduct of their work.
> I have customers.
Let me guess. There's no paper trail whatsoever.
Nothing in the public record either.
No patents, no nothing.
|
| Show full article (0.99Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Michael A. TerrellMichael A. Terrell Date: Aug 26, 2008 20:15
Bret Cahill wrote:
>
> "In the land of the blind delusionals the one eyed man is king."
In that land you would still be the biggest buffoon.
--
http://improve-usenet.org/index.html
aioe.org, Goggle Groups, and Web TV users must request to be white
listed, or I will not see your messages.
If you have broadband, your ISP may have a NNTP news server included in
your account: http://www.usenettools.net/ISP.htm
There are two kinds of people on this earth:
The crazy, and the insane.
The first sign of insanity is denying that you're crazy.
|
| |
| 3 Comments |
|
|
Author: Rob DekkerRob Dekker Date: Aug 27, 2008 14:18
"Michael A. Terrell" earthlink.net> wrote in message news:YfydnfRusflDWynVnZ2dnUVZ_trinZ2d@earthlink.com...>
> Bret Cahill wrote:
>>
>> "In the land of the blind delusionals the one eyed man is king."
>
>
> In that land you would still be the biggest buffoon.
>
Michael,
I'm not speaking for Bret here, since he makes his own dicisions about what he writes, and what he chooses to read,
but it seems to me that this sort of plain insulting posts does not add anything positive to this NG.
So kind request : please refrain from remarks like this.
Thanks
Rob
|
| Show full article (1.02Kb) |
| 1 Comment |
|
|
Author: BretCahillBretCahill Date: Aug 28, 2008 21:04
>>> "In the land of the blind delusionals the one eyed man is king."
>
>> �In that land you would still be the biggest buffoon.
>
> Michael,
>
> I'm not speaking for Bret here, since he makes his own dicisions about what he writes, and what he chooses to read,
> but it seems to me that this sort of plain insulting posts does not add anything positive to this NG.
> So kind request : please refrain from remarks like this.
The sock puppeteer(s?) might make some money in the entirely reputable
field of science fiction novel writing. It's basically the same
thing except lots of characters instead of sock puppets and the
"creator" openly admits it's fiction.
But there's no just money in trying to fake a background in tech . . .
no matter _how_ many sock puppets are deployed.
Bret Cahill
|
| |
| 1 Comment |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: John FieldsJohn Fields Date: Aug 29, 2008 03:57
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:04:57 -0700 (PDT), BretCahill@ peoplepc.com
wrote:
>>>> "In the land of the blind delusionals the one eyed man is king."
>>
>>> ?In that land you would still be the biggest buffoon.
>But there's no just money in trying to fake a background in tech . . .
---
As you've learned recently, what with getting slapped around for
pretending to be an expert in electric tractors and thermodynamics
when you couldn't even figure out a simple heat sink problem.
Phucking phony, why don't you get away from the technical newsgroups,
where you clearly don't belong, and start frequenting some place like
alt.ignorant.assholes, where you'd be surrounded by peers?
JF
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
