>>
>> And lsender is saying that no facts can contravene the truths
>> contained in the Bible. Â Therefore, in spiritual matters, all facts can be
>> ignored, and replaced with faith in the authority of the Bible. Â
>>
> I suppose one of the reasons why I stop replying is because
> I eventually have to conclude that you just don't get it.
Could be. But aren't you an educator?
What
> you have written in the above paragraph is little more than
> a tergiversation.
Tell me why. It was not intended as such.
Perhaps you are not trained in philosophical
> thought processes. Perhaps your rose colored glasses are so
> firmly afixed that everything you read is always already pre-
> supposed.
More likely, however, would be a third possiblilty.
I don't know and frankly, I don't care. Either way,
> you don't represent what I took a fair amount of time writing.
> The reason for this is not important. That you wrongly digest
> it is.
Perhaps yo do not fully appeciate the implications of what you write?
I'll admit that what I wrote was not phrased politely, but I believe it to
be accurate.
Tell me where I'e gone wrong. Can any facts contravene the truths
expressed in the Bible?
In spiritual matters, must one check facts outside of what is expressed in
the bible? Does one not instead faithfully believe the Bible, and accept
it as authority?
Y'know, I was really starting to think that maybe you DID hae a defensible
position, in some respects, despite your failure or refusal to answer
challenging questions.
> So, I see no reason to reply further because you seem unable to
> correctly digest what has already been written.
Coward.
--
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so
certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
-- Bertrand Russel
