On Aug 1, 8:02Â am, George Hammond
notspam.org> wrote:> On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:38:54 -0700 (PDT),
>
>
>
>
>
> panamfl...@
hotmail.com wrote:
>>On Jul 31, 4:55Â pm, George Hammond
notspam.org> wrote:>>> On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:36:41 -0700 (PDT), Uncle Vic
>
>>>>On Jul 31, 8:12 am, George Hammond
hotmail.com> wrote:>
>>>>> Â THE PROBABILITY OF HELL
>
>>>>The same as the probability of Naraka, Diyu, Duat, Niflheim, Tartarus,
>>>>Jahannam, Jigoku, Sheol, and Yomi.
>
>>>>ZERO.
>
>>> [Hammond]
>>> Â Â One thing contemporary science can be sure of.... the
>>> probability of Hell is NOT ZERO.
>>> Â Â p>0 simply because there EXISTS a plausible scientific
>>> mechanism by which such a thing COULD exist.... and I mean
>>> plausible WITHOUT appealing to "speculative woo woo
>>> science".
>
>>>>Now run along and play with your deluded friends, KoOk.
>
>>> [Hammond]
>>> Â Â What friends birdbrain?
>
>>Finally, something accurate from Hammond. He has no friends.
>
> [Hammond]
> Â Â I have female friends... I've just never seen a man who
> didn't make my blood boil with contempt.... I dunno... maybe
> all men are like that...no?
If you cant prove that, how you going to prove God?
One of the sources of your frustration is you are always 'judging
God', if you accept the premise that there is nothing other than God.
A child sees God in a butterfly. NASA sepnds billions on the search.
I listened to a lady who was about to give birth, and her captors , as
they were leaving, decided to cut her achilies tendons so she couldnt
escape. She gave birth, and her baby was eaten by dogs that were
roaming the streets. Just another story from hell, Rowanda district.
Proof?
BOfL
