Author: chazwinchazwin Date: Feb 2, 2008 07:11
On Feb 2, 1:03 pm, "THE BORG" outthere.com> wrote:
> You cannot go much by instincts on the Earth of today.
> In days of yore - the male had a very strong "protective" instinct toward the
> female. The female was considered weaker - vulnerable - fragile and the men
> grew tall and strong and were in control and fought wars of honour.
You clearly have not studied the Paleolithic. Take a look at the
"Willendorf Venus"!
Their
> leadership of Earth by the male was not questioned. And indeed the art -
> literature - science - philosophy - music - architecture are all
> verifications of this dominance by the male.
> These days - due to the liberation of women and feminism - this protective
> instinct for the female is gone.
What you laughingly call "protective" is actually "proprietorial".
What you see as vulnerable is actually chattel.
> Now if a male wishes to be chivalrous or polite and offer a lady a seat he is
> greeted with "Fuck off - I can stand perfectly well thank you" (or similar).
Has this happened to you?
> This has caused a spate of vulgarity - bad language - nastiness - rudeness
> (much evidenced on usenet) and the chivalry and honour and code of conduct by
> which the male lived has effectively been...
|