Re: The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind         

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: turtoni
Date: Sep 11, 2008 08:06

On Sep 11, 10:50 am, ZerkonX X.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 17:47:10 -0700, turtoni wrote:
>> "Julian Jaynes (February 27, 1920 – November 21, 1997) was an American
>> psychologist, best known for his book The Origin of Consciousness in the
>> Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind (1976), in which he argued that ancient
>> peoples were not conscious (did not possess an introspective
>> mind-space), but instead had their behavior directed by auditory
>> hallucinations, which they interpreted as the voice of their chief,
>> king, or the gods. Jaynes argued that the change from this mode of
>> thinking (which he called the bicameral mind) to consciousness occurred
>> over a period of centuries about three thousand years ago and was based
>> on the development of metaphorical language and the emergence of
>> writing."
>
> This seems to make basic sense. But, this...
> =====================
> Lascaux is the setting of a complex of caves in southwestern France
> famous for its prehistoric cave paintings. The original caves are located
> near the village of Montignac, in the Dordogne département. They contain
> some of the most well-known Upper Paleolithic art. These paintings are
> estimated to be 16,000 years old. They primarily consist of realistic
> images of large animals, most of which are known from fossil evidence to
> have lived in the area at the time. Lascaux was added to the UNESCO World
> Heritage Sites list in 1979.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lascaux
> =======================
>
> kinda messes the time line up a little. Recently a art historian's has
> argued that these paintings were not strictly representative but also
> interpretive as well. In any case wouldn't these paintings defeat this
> entire argument?
>
>> "At one time, human nature was split in two, an executive part called a
>> god, and a follower part called a man. Neither part was Consciously
>> aware.â€
>
> booo!! booo!! Fractionalism, Id, Ego, Superego ... Parent, Child, Adult
> BOOO!  
>
> Given that split what else but..
>
>
>
>> According to Jaynes, ancient people in the bicameral state would
>> function in a manner similar to that of a modern-day schizophrenic.
>>.......
>
> .. this 'idea' of mind as separate parts, one 'talking' to the other and
> so forth, this can cause a mental illness.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> In his 1976 work The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the
>> Bicameral Mind, Julian Jaynes proposed that human brains existed in a
>> bicameral state until as recently as 3000 years ago. Jaynes builds a
>> case for this hypothesis by citing evidence from many diverse sources
>> including historical literature. He took an interdisciplinary approach,
>> drawing data from many different fields.
>
>> Jaynes asserts that until roughly the times written about in Homer's
>> Iliad, humans did not generally have the self-awareness characteristic
>> of consciousness as most people experience it today. Rather, Jaynes
>> argued that the bicameral individual was guided by mental commands
>> believed to be issued by external "gods"—the commands which were so
>> often recorded in ancient myths, legends and historical accounts; these
>> commands were however emanating from individuals' own minds. This is
>> exemplified not only in the commands given to characters in ancient
>> epics but also the very muses of Greek mythology which "sang" the poems:
>> Jaynes argues that while later interpretations see the muses as a simple
>> personification of creative inspiration, the ancients literally heard
>> muses as the direct source of their music and poetry.
>
> Interesting. There is a double edge-ness to this. Poems and songs are
> easier to remember. Also, even today artistic inspiration is not entirely
> accounted for within the mental mechanic, even though it is taken for
> granted that this happens 'in one's own mind'. Still, it is typical for
> arty people to describe their work as 'coming to them' as opposed to
> entirely 'from them' as if they were channeling some other force.
>
>> ......................
>> Even in modern times, Jaynes notes that there is no consensus as to the
>> cause or origins of schizophrenia (the subject is still hotly debated).
>> According to Jaynes, schizophrenia is simply a vestige of humanity's
>> earlier state.[4] Recent evidence shows that many schizophrenics don't
>> just hear random voices but experience "command hallucinations"
>> instructing their behavior or urging them to commit certain acts. As
>> support for Jaynes's argument, these command hallucinations are little
>> different from the commands from gods which feature so prominently in
>> ancient stories....
>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
>
> The_Origin_of_Consciousness_in_the_Breakdown_of_the_Bicameral_Mind
>
> Very dicey seems to me. If hallucination or delusion were a dominate
> aspect of the ancients they would not have lasted very long. Maybe, like
> today, it occurred in a few members of a large group but true group
> schizophrenia would have been too destructive.

With the main point being that the voice you hear in your head (your
consciousness) was perceived differently in the Bicameral mind since
the left half of the brain had not be developed.

So the undeveloped "consciousness" was making "noises" (auditory
"hallucinations") in the bicameral man's mind "which they interpreted
as the voice of their chief, king, or the gods."
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!