> Doesn't quantum mechanics suggest J.Krishnamurti was right?

> Doesn't quantum mechanics suggest J.Krishnamurti was right?
>

> Doesn't quantum mechanics suggest J.Krishnamurti was right?

> ta wrote:

>> Doesn't quantum mechanics suggest J.Krishnamurti was right?

>
> For the unenlightened, could you please elaborate on that???
>
> not being facetious
> K e v

> kevirwin wrote:

>> ta wrote:

>>> Doesn't quantum mechanics suggest J.Krishnamurti was right?

>>
>> For the unenlightened, could you please elaborate on that???
>>
>> not being facetious
>> K e v

>
> What was it the JK actually said in this respect?

> chazwin wrote:

>> kevirwin wrote:

>>> ta wrote:

>>>> Doesn't quantum mechanics suggest J.Krishnamurti was right?

>>>
>>> For the unenlightened, could you please elaborate on that???
>>>
>>> not being facetious
>>> K e v

>>
>> What was it the JK actually said in this respect?

>
> I don't know, if you were asking me...hence I asked for an
> elaboration.. Evidently Brian understood it, and I assume the
> originator of the thread can explain it. I'm guessing it's some
> mystical reference that corresponds to a theory in science, so it
> aroused my curiosity.
>
> K e v ...

>
> kevirwin wrote:

>> ta wrote:

>>> Doesn't quantum mechanics suggest J.Krishnamurti was right?

>>
>> For the unenlightened, could you please elaborate on that???
>>
>> not being facetious
>> K e v

>
> What was it the JK actually said in this respect?
>

>
> kevirwin wrote:

>> chazwin wrote:

>>> kevirwin wrote:

>>>> ta wrote:

>>>>> Doesn't quantum mechanics suggest J.Krishnamurti was right?

>>>>
>>>> For the unenlightened, could you please elaborate on that???
>>>>
>>>> not being facetious
>>>> K e v

>>>
>>> What was it the JK actually said in this respect?

>>
>> I don't know, if you were asking me...hence I asked for an
>> elaboration.. Evidently Brian understood it, and I assume the
>> originator of the thread can explain it. I'm guessing it's some
>> mystical reference that corresponds to a theory in science, so it ...

> "chazwin" yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1162800178.957399.284030@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...

>>
>> kevirwin wrote:

>>> ta wrote:

>>>> Doesn't quantum mechanics suggest J.Krishnamurti was right?

>>>
>>> For the unenlightened, could you please elaborate on that???
>>>
>>> not being facetious
>>> K e v

>>
>> What was it the JK actually said in this respect?
>>

>
> You mean you actually want to find out what he said BEFORE you start your
> diatribe?