Re: The Mike Gordge challenge
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: The Mike Gordge challenge         

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: chazwin
Date: Oct 3, 2006 11:43

Immortalist wrote:
> chazwin wrote:
>> Chaz says:
>> "The truely wise leave the "absolute certainties" to god botherers,
>> Islamic fundementalists, and fuckwits like you Mikey!!! "
>>
>>
>> Mikey Says:
>> "To remind you of the original question:" Why dont you explain to the
>> world what element of doubt YOU obviously have that you are not a
>> pedophile chaz."
>>
>
> Wise people do not concern themselves with absolute certainty to an
> unnecessary degree.
>
> All people who are not uncertain that they are not pedophiles are
> pedophiles.

You have 3 negatives in this statement have you lost track here?
2 negatives make a positive.
Lets translate: "all people who are (not uncertain = certain) certain
that they are not pedophiles are pedophiles" No - that can't be
right!!!hehehe
OR
All persons who are unceratin that they are pedophiles are pedophiles.
>
> Therefore those who don't concern themselves with perfect knowledge are
> child abusers.

Er - only according to Mikey???!?!?!
>
> Therefore wise people must be pedophiles.

So what is a pedophile?
>
> wooaa, I didn't know my approach was so perverted loc. But it was a
> wonderful example of the easy refutation of universal or global
> skepticism.
>
> Know-Nothing Universal Skepticism: Positive & Negative Forms
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.philosophy/msg/b86ea8051203c7f6
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!