| Re: The Issue: Evidence that God is Real |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: SmilerSmiler Date: Aug 14, 2008 17:45
> In alt.religion.christian Alen westserv.net.au> wrote:
>>> It is much more sensible
>> to hold that a cause must already contain the qualities it
>> confers on its effects, and not be totally lacking in them.
>
> Yes. That makes sense.
>
> So what cause contains the qualities of God? It is more sensible to hold
> that the cause of God must already contains the qualities of God, in order
> to confer on God, and not be totally lacking in them. Right?
[...]
> The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so
> certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
> -- Bertrand Russel
I never said that God had to be caused.
===============================
They why does the universe have to be caused?
If you can have an uncaused god, you can have anything else uncaused.
If your god was caused, what being greater than him caused him?
And what even greater being caused the being that caused your god?
Turtles all the way down?
Logic doesn't seem to be your strongpoint.
Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279
| 
