> "Alen" westserv.net.au> skrev i en meddelelsenews:16eddee9-00f6-4d45-9725-fbbd97a8f84b@l33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
> On Aug 11, 1:55 am, EskWI...@spamblock.panix.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
>

>> In alt.religion.christian lsend...@hotmail.com wrote:

>>>> How about being a bit less vague. Point to a specific piece of
>>>> evidence
>>>> and explain why it is evidence for God. You would be the first to be
>>>> able to support the contention that there is evidence for God.
>>>> Everyone
>>>> else has failed, so if you accomplish this, you will have a lot to be
>>>> proud of.

>

>>> Again, the evidence is not the issue.

>

>> It is now.

>

>> Can you demonstrate any evidence at all for the reality of the
>> Judeo/Muslim/Christian God?

>

>> IIWY, I'd present something unasailable. One convincing, irrefutable
>> piece of evedence. One piece that would be SO conincing, that nobody
>> could have any serious doubts after examining it.

>

>> Does any such evidence exist? Does any evidence of any kind whatsoever
>> exist?

>
> Everyone who doesn't believe always assumes that it is self
> evident that visual, irrefutable proof is the decisive requirement
> needed to turn the credibility of a belief into a weapon of
> victory, as if this must unquestionably be the desired aim. Everyone
> seems to suppose, in keeping with the modern, universal,
> psychological illness, that everything always has to be a 'contest',
> with a 'winner' and a 'loser'.
> __________________________________
> thomas
>
> No, proof is not the issue.  Either you have evidence or you do not.
> Obviously you do not.
> _________________________________
>
> Allen
>
>  After Jesus' resurrection,