Re: The Ignoble Savage
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: The Ignoble Savage         

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: bigfletch8
Date: Sep 8, 2008 00:55

On Sep 5, 4:56 pm, Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Sep 4, 11:40 pm, turtoni fastmail.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Sep 5, 2:34 am, Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>> On Sep 4, 11:22 pm, turtoni fastmail.net> wrote:
>
>>>> On Sep 5, 2:04 am, Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>>>> On Sep 4, 10:30 pm, turtoni fastmail.net> wrote:
>
>>>>>> "Man isn't a noble savage, he's an ignoble savage. He is irrational,
>>>>>> brutal, weak, silly, unable to be objective about anything where his
>>>>>> wn interests are involved - that about sums it up. I'm interested in
>>>>>> the brutal and violent nature of man because it's a true picture of
>>>>>> him. And any attempt to create social institutions on a false view of
>>>>>> the nature of man is probably doomed to failure." - Stanley Kubrick
>
>>>>>> This is such a great quote.
>
>>>>>> Let us remember that:
>>>>>> "**ANY** attempt to create social institutions on a false view of the
>>>>>> nature of man is probably doomed to failure."
>
>>>>>> And that includes other nations...
>
>>>>>> And that we should be:
>>>>>> "interested in the brutal and violent nature of man because it's a
>>>>>> true picture of him."
>
>>>>>> dot dot dot
>
>>>>> If these behaviors are parts of our nature and there are other less
>>>>> violent parts of our nature why are some parts of our nature good and
>>>>> others bad?
>
>>>> Why is there good and bad?
>
>>>> There is good and bad because we're "conscious".
>
>>> So we should build our society around the good and bad in man and
>>> woman in an honest way.
>
>> The word "man" is a placeholder for "people".
>
>> Honest is too subjective. None of us are "honest".
>
>> We need law and order.
>
> I agree and that is the idea behind checks and balances. Those times
> when some harm others and interfere with theory right to survive we
> need an independent process that takes human impulses out of the
> equation as much as possible.
>
> "It is by balancing each of these powers against the other two, that
> the efforts in human nature toward tyranny can alone be checked and
> restrained, and any degree of freedom preserved in the Constitution."
> --John Adams- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

With the emphasis on "the idea". Never works, but an honest attempt.

BOfL
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!