Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: turtoniturtoni Date: Sep 4, 2008 23:22
On Sep 5, 2:04Â am, Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Sep 4, 10:30 pm, turtoni fastmail.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> "Man isn't a noble savage, he's an ignoble savage. He is irrational,
>> brutal, weak, silly, unable to be objective about anything where his
>> wn interests are involved - that about sums it up. I'm interested in
>> the brutal and violent nature of man because it's a true picture of
>> him. And any attempt to create social institutions on a false view of
>> the nature of man is probably doomed to failure." - Stanley Kubrick
>
>> This is such a great quote.
>
>> Let us remember that:
>> "**ANY** attempt to create social institutions on a false view of the
>> nature of man is probably doomed to failure."
>
>> And that includes other nations...
>
>> And that we should be:
>> "interested in the brutal and violent nature of man because it's a
>> true picture of him."
>
>> dot dot dot
>
> If these behaviors are parts of our nature and there are other less
> violent parts of our nature why are some parts of our nature good and
> others bad?
Why is there good and bad?
There is good and bad because we're "conscious".
|