Re: The holographic trap
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: The holographic trap         

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: Immortalist
Date: Sep 17, 2008 21:32

On Sep 17, 4:42 pm, "bigflet...@gmail.com" gmail.com>
wrote:
> Everybody you meet (with very few exceptions) projects expectations on
> you, and by definition, seeks in kind.. The closer the relationship,
> the greater the projection.We each identify with such expectations.
>

Reciprocal altruism is probably one of our strongest instincts,
expecting fairness and a good deal, you know how bad it feels when you
think you were cheated?

In evolutionary biology, reciprocal altruism is a form of altruism in
which one organism provides a benefit to another in the expectation of
future reciprocation. This is equivalent to the Tit for tat strategy
in game theory. It would only be expected to evolve in the presence of
a mechanism to identify and punish "cheaters". An example of
reciprocal altruism is blood-sharing in the vampire bat, in which bats
feed regurgitated blood to those who have not collected much blood
themselves knowing that they themselves may someday benefit from this
same donation; cheaters are remembered by the colony and ousted from
this collaboration.

In a series of ground-breaking contributions to biology in the early
1970s Robert Trivers introduced the theories of reciprocal altruism
(1971), parental investment (1972), and parent-offspring conflict
(1974). Trivers' paper "The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism" (1971)
elaborates the mathematics of reciprocal altruism and includes human
reciprocal altruism as one of the three examples used to illustrate
the model, arguing that "it can be shown that the details of the
psychological system that regulates this altruism can be explained by
this model." In particular, Trivers argues for the following
characteristics as functional processes subserving reciprocal
altruism:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reciprocal_altruism
> In modern society, those projections come at you from all angles.

If the Savanna Principle is a theory about the evolutionary roots of
the human brain and asserts that the environment that molded the human
brain through natural selection is drastically different than the
world humans currently live in, then disparity between what man was
designed to do and what he currently can do leads to a host of
societal difficulties, one being how to deal with this internal drive
to expect fairness instead of cheating.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savanna_principle
http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/MES/pdf/MDE2004.pdf
http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/MES/pdf/JCEP2006.pdf
> The
> image makers are now at their most powerful in history. "Success" is
> how you look, what you wear, where you live, what you drive etc etc.
> Slavery has simply become more suble.It becomes self imposed.
>
> Why should this be seen as progress from a spiritual (not religious)
> perspective?
>
> The farther away you get from your true identity, the greater the urge
> to find yourself.
>
> What about the few who dont have any expectations of you? They likely
> already have.
>
> BOfL
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!