You have not shown how they are impossible and the evidence that they
happened is a necessary argument for their possibility. You must learn
how to argue that it is impossible for these things to happen and that
there is only one possible way. Or else you must join in with all the
other inductive/probable theories and compete with other strong ideas
about how it happened. Your resort to miracles requires a miracle of
disbelief.

The only designer in nature is the blind forces of physics, albeit
deployed in a very special way... it is the blind designer.

Contrasting the differences between human design and its potential for
planning with the workings of natural selection can lead to the
argument that evolutionary processes can achieve about any design
possible.

The complexity of living organisms may be sufficient evidence for the
existence of a divine creator but it is not a necessary condition
since the evidence for this theory does not make design by natural
selection an impossibility. These are both theories then because one
cannot elimnate the other completely.