|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
| Re: The Goldfish and the Bowl - A Study in the Nature of Modern Reality |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: Colonel SandersColonel Sanders Date: Dec 28, 2007 21:00
On Dec 29, 6:51 am, Day Brown hughes.net> wrote:> On Dec 28, 12:51 pm, Colonel Sanders unwired.com.au>
> wrote:> That democracy is better than authoritarianism.
>
> What I see coming out of the natural extension of feminism is neither.
> The history is obscure, but there are examples where women ran things,
> and while they did have queens, that didnt result in the same kind of
> authoritarianism.
>
> After all, the Gautamid Queen of Kucha didnt need a harem. So, she
> didnt need a palace to keep them in, nor a castle to protect the
> palace. So, she didnt need to tax the shit out of everyone to pay for
> it. While there are innumerable variations, it was pretty common of
> the menopausal women you refer to own communal houses and be the house
> mothers. They therefore also owned all the girls. They didnt sell them
> or marry them off.
>
> From puberty on, a man could rent a girl long enuf for his sexual
> needs, and they commonly sent some to do stints in the harems of China
> or Persia, but the prince was always glad to change the older girls
> for younger ones. The Kuchi were also the priciest call girls in Xian.
> But as their youth faded, they came back to Kucha, or moved into some
> other shipping office of the Silk Road.
>
> Each generation of girls performed sexual services for only that
> period when their youth and beauty brought the maximum profit. But
> during that period, part of the proceeds from their services was used
> to properly educate them for other businesses. I've been told by young
> women today that they did much the same thing, graduating with their
> degrees but not having hugh college loans to pay for. No doubt it will
> become a trend.
>
> But already, young women, 21-30, make more money than young men, so
> the only men with the money to pay for sexual services are over 30,
> and as time goes on, and women move ever higher in the corporate
> structures, displacing men, the number of well heeled customers for
> the sexual services of girls will dramatically decline.
>The interesting thing is that gay men are also displacing heterosexual
males - now women have a problem developing as unlike men they
are too proud and never look down when searching for a partner.
There is no room for feminism in the 21'st century. Women are already
independent, treated with preference at the job interview, overpaid
and oversexed. It's about time for them to stop complaining and look
for a way to give back to society.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
