|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: janpajakjanpajak Date: Sep 26, 2007 19:19
Here it is, "the father of all proofs". It formally proves that "God
does exist". It is not the only proof that proves the existence of
God. But it is the shortest, the most sure, it cannot be undermined
(it was already discussed in internet in a different language), and it
is based on the "genetic code" about which everyone knows. Of course,
the "internet terrorists" about which I wrote on the thread
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_thread/thread/f43b7ee2d9d8e837/e...#ecabc492dd893a64
for sure are going to attack this proof. After all, they attack
everything that is moral and progressive. However, even with their
experience in "throwing dirt" they will be unable to prove that "white
is black". So all they can do is to throw a lot of dirt at this proof
and at myself...
|
| Show full article (9.61Kb) |
|
| | 12 Comments |
|
|
Author: AlAl Date: Sep 26, 2007 19:38
On Sep 27, 12:19 pm, janpa...@ gmail.com wrote: > Here it is, "the father of all proofs". It formally proves that "God
> does exist". It is not the only proof that proves the existence of
> God. But it is the shortest, the most sure, it cannot be undermined
> (it was already discussed in internet in a different language), and it
> is based on the "genetic code" about which everyone knows.
If I talk fast enough, people stop listening to the words.
But god is faith, and without faith, god is nothing. So by prooving
god exists, surely he/she is now nothing.
The premise that languages are created only by design is so clearly
false to anyone who speaks English it's hard to conceive of people
holding that belief. I do understand that many other languages may be
more designoid than English, but it's still argument from lack of
negative evidence. ie BS.
And while I'm at it, formal proof is pretty much a term reserved for
mathematics, and always hinges on axioms that should be stated first.
One axiom I'm working on is that you're a nut.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: geoprocgeoproc Date: Sep 26, 2007 19:40
> Here it is, "the father of all proofs". It formally proves that "God
> does exist". It is not the only proof that proves the existence of
> God. But it is the shortest, the most sure, it cannot be undermined
> (it was already discussed in internet in a different language), and it
> is based on the "genetic code" about which everyone knows. Of course,
> the "internet terrorists" about which I wrote on the threadhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_thread/thread/f43b7ee...
> for sure are going to attack this proof. After all, they attack
> everything that is moral and progressive. However, even with their
> experience in "throwing dirt" they will be unable to prove that "white
> is black". So all they can do is to throw a lot of dirt at this proof
> and at myself. But they will NOT be able to undermine this proof. It
> is impossible to undermine it, because the existence of God is fact,
> and no evil force can hide it from us. So please read this short proof
> provided below. But before I show it, firstly a few words of usual
> introduction.
>
> In the second semester of 2007 by some strange act of God I was
> granted the privilege of giving a series of
> lectures from the mathematical logic on a Korean University (for ...
|
| Show full article (10.88Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Lee Oswald VingLee Oswald Ving Date: Sep 26, 2007 19:42
> P.S. Because many people seek my discussion threads for the
> informative values, novelty, honesty, morality, peacefulness, and
> truth - from now on, to allow find these threads easier, I am adding
> the symbol (PDE JP) at the end of their title.
Odd way of saying "making killfiling easier," but, hey - thanks. It's a
rare quality in a net.loon.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Tom McDonaldTom McDonald Date: Sep 26, 2007 19:43
On Sep 26, 9:19 pm, janpa...@ gmail.com wrote:
Have you run this past George Hammond yet? If not, you are wasting
your time here. He's the only one who could possibly comprehend your
work.
The two of you are obviously destined to revolutionize both science
and religion. In fact, you will undoubtedly, the pair of you, make
talk.origins obsolete in one fell swoop.
That would clearly show them.
ngs>
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: JeckylJeckyl Date: Sep 26, 2007 19:46
> Here it is, "the father of all proofs". It formally proves that "God
> does exist".
This should be hillarious
> It is not the only proof that proves the existence of
> God.
Odd .. there has not been one that is acutally valid before
> But it is the shortest, the most sure, it cannot be undermined
> (it was already discussed in internet in a different language), and it
> is based on the "genetic code" about which everyone knows.
Oh yes .. we all learn to recite it off -by-heart in kindergarten
> Of course,
> the "internet terrorists" about which I wrote on the thread
You mean people who can see nonsense as what it is
|
| Show full article (5.76Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ImmortalistImmortalist Date: Sep 26, 2007 21:16
On Sep 26, 7:19 pm, janpa...@ gmail.com wrote: > Here it is, "the father of all proofs". It formally proves that "God
> does exist". It is not the only proof that proves the existence of
> God. But it is the shortest, the most sure, it cannot be undermined
> (it was already discussed in internet in a different language), and it
> is based on the "genetic code" about which everyone knows. Of course,
> the "internet terrorists" about which I wrote on the threadhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_thread/thread/f43b7ee...
> for sure are going to attack this proof. After all, they attack
> everything that is moral and progressive. However, even with their
> experience in "throwing dirt" they will be unable to prove that "white
> is black". So all they can do is to throw a lot of dirt...
|
| Show full article (1.28Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: KermitKermit Date: Sep 26, 2007 22:04
On Sep 26, 7:19 pm, janpa...@ gmail.com wrote: > Here it is, "the father of all proofs". It formally proves that "God
> does exist".
> completed with the use of methods of mathematical logic:
>
> Theorem:
> "God does exist".
> Basis propositions:
> (1) "Genetic code displays all attributes of intelligent
> codes
Really? Cites, please.
> and according to the Shannon's Theory of Communication all codes
> are versions of languages. All languages are formed by intelligent
> beings.
I'm sorry; I missed where you established that.
|
| Show full article (9.91Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Uncle AlUncle Al Date: Sep 27, 2007 10:22
>
> Here it is, "the father of all proofs". It formally proves that "God
> does exist".
[snip crap]
God does not exist - Spanish Inquisition, Black Plague, Easter Island,
Turkish Armenian genocide, Hitler's camps, Japan in Manchukuo,
Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Russia's gulags, China's Great Leap Forward,
Cambodian Khmer Rouge, US prison system.
Google Images
"Stanley Miller" 1650 hits
You are no Tommy Aquinas.
Hindus have 30 crores of gods - 300 million deities. How big is your
proof? Does it include the Olde Religion, Native American animism,
and Scientology? What about the Antarctic Tolte and their gods of
heat and cold?
While you are making a public ass of yourself, rationalize the
religions of the following Antarctic aboriginee tribes (population in
parentheses)
|
| Show full article (1.39Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Mark IsaakMark Isaak Date: Sep 27, 2007 11:45
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 19:19:52 -0700, janpajak wrote:
> Here it is, "the father of all proofs". It formally proves that "God
> does exist".
Great! And I can prove that poison ivy does exist. Now that God's
existence is proven, God deserves as much veneration as poison ivy does.
--
Mark Isaak eciton (at) earthlink (dot) net
"Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of
the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are
being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and
exposing the country to danger." -- Hermann Goering
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
