>
> ...genetic medicine, a place that researchers say increasing numbers
> of us may visit in the years ahead. In 1997 there were genetic tests
> for about 150 inherited diseases. Today, that figure exceeds 1,100 and
> grows daily. Most tests can't determine for sure that you'll develop a
> specific disease -- but they can often tell you whether you're an
> above-average candidate for a slew of conditions. Positive results can
> spur you into fight mode, hoping to avoid what your twisted strands of
> DNA have in store for you. But, though knowledge is power, it can be
> hard to accept: You're forced to squint into a future in which your
> body is more vulnerable than you expected, and the TMI factor can be
> daunting...
>
>
http://www.womenshealthmag.com/health/dna-testing
>
> Medical genetics is the specialty of medicine that involves the
> diagnosis and management of hereditary disorders. Medical genetics
> differs from Human genetics in that human genetics is a field of
> scientific research that may or may not apply to medicine, but medical
> genetics refers to the application of genetics to medical care. For
> example, research on the causes and inheritance of genetic disorders
> would be considered within both human genetics and medical genetics,
> while the diagnosis, management, and counseling of individuals with
> genetic disorders would be considered part of medical genetics. In
> contrast, the study of typically non-medical phenotypes such as the
> genetics of eye color would be considered part of human genetics, but
> not necessarily relevant to medical genetics (except in situations
> such as albinism). Genetic medicine is a newer term for medical
> genetics and incorporates areas such as gene therapy and personalized
> medicine.
>
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_genetics
>
> ...The causes of human experience include genes, accidents,
> infections, birth order, teachers, parents, circumstance, opportunity,
> and chance, to name just the most obvious. Sometimes one cause looms
> large, but not always. When you catch a cold the chief cause is a
> virus, but when you catch pneumonia the bacterium is only an
> opportunist-your immune system usually needs to have been run down
> first by starvation, hypothermia, or stress. Is that the "true" cause?
> Likewise, "genetic" diseases such as Huntington's chorea are caused
> precisely and simply by a mutation in one gene; environmental factors
> have almost no influence on the outcome. But phenylketonuria (PKU), a
> form of mental retardation caused by an inability to digest
> phenylalanine, could be said to be caused by the mutation, or by phen-
> ylalanine in the diet-it can be seen as either nature or nurture,
> depending on your bias. How much more complex is the pattern when many
> different genes and many different environmental factors are almost
> certainly involved, as is probably the case with schizophrenia.
>
> NATURE VIA NURTURE - genes, experience, and what makes us human
>
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0060006781/
Yes, I have the book. You have to read between the lines to see that
race does alter the probabilities of any given conception to be more or
less endowed with talent, character, or challenges. It'd be nice if
Liberals would give up on Affirmative Action, which only promotes the
election of racist demagogues, and take Dr. King's advice, to judge each
INDIVIDUAL on the content of his character. We have the DNA markers, the
bloodwork on brain chemistry, even the brain scans, as well as the long
established batteries of personality and talent assessment tests to do
it that way. And blow off worry over quotas.
Alas, Liberals are as neurotic as every other group and will not admit
what is real based on recent scientific data. All you can do is move to
a racially homogeneous community where people are therefore forced to
evaluate individuals as individuals.