> Let's think of an aspirin pill for a moment; you will immediately
> recall the mark in the middle of it. This mark is designed in order to
> help those who intake half a dose. Every product that we see around us
> is of a certain design even though not as simple as the aspirin pill.
> Everything from vehicles we use to go to work, to TV remotes.
> "Design", briefly, means a harmonious assembling of various parts into
> an orderly form towards a common goal. Going by this definition, one
> would have no difficulty in guessing that a car is a design. This is
> because there is a certain goal, which is to transport people and
> cargo. In realization of this goal various parts such as the engine,
> tires and body are planned and assembled in the plant.
>
> However, what about a living creature? Can a bird and mechanics of its
> flying be a design as well? Before giving an answer, let us repeat the
> evaluation we did for the example of a car. The goal at hand, in this
> case, is to fly. For this purpose, hollowed bones, strong muscles that
> move these bones are utilized together with feathers capable of
> suspending in the air. Wings are formed aerodynamically, and
> metabolism is in tune with the bird's need for high levels of energy.
> It is obvious that the bird is product of a certain design.
>
> If one explores other creatures besides a bird, similar facts are
> attained. There are examples of a certain meticulous design in every
> creature. If one continues further on this quest, one would discover
> that our selves are also a part of this certain design. Your hands
> that hold these pages are functional as no robot hands could ever be.
> Your eyes that read these lines are making vision possible with such
> focus that the best camera on earth simply cannot.
>
> Hence one arrives at this important conclusion; all creatures in
> Nature, including us, are of a Design. This, in turn, shows the
> existence of a Creator Who designs all creatures at will, sustains the
> entire nature and holds absolute power and wisdom.
>
> However, this truth is rejected by the theory of evolution that was
> formed in the middle of 19th century. The theory set forth in Charles
> Darwin's book "On The Origin of Species" asserts that all creatures
> evolved within a chain of coincidences and essentially mutated from
> one another.
>
> According to the fundamental assertion of this theory all living
> things go through minute and coincidental changes. If these
> coincidental changes help the creature then it gains advantage over
> the others, which in turn is carried onto following generations.
>
> This scenario has been passed around as if it is a very scientific and
> convincing one for 140 years. When scrutinized under a bigger
> microscope and when compared against the examples of the Design in
> creatures Darwin's theory paints a very different picture i.e.
> Darwinism's explanation of creation is nothing more than a self-
> conflicting vicious circle.
>
> Let us first focus on the "coincidental changes". Darwin could not
> provide a comprehensive definition to this concept due to lack of
> genealogical knowledge in his time. The evolutionists who followed him
> put forth the concept of "mutation" on this subject. Mutation is
> arbitrary disconnections, dislocation or shifts of genes in living
> things. Most important point is that there is not one single mutation
> in history that is shown to improve the condition of genetic
> information of a creature. Nearly all the known cases of mutations
> disable or harm these creatures and the rest are neutral in effect.
> Therefore, to think that a creature can improve through mutation is
> same as shooting at a crowd of people and hope that the injuries will
> result in healthier and improved individuals. This would clearly be
> nonsense.
>
> As importantly, on contrary to all the scientific data, even if one
> assumes that a certain mutation could actually improve a being's
> condition,
> Darwinism still cannot be delivered from inevitable collapse. The
> reason for this is a concept called "irreducible complexity".
>
> The implication of this concept is that majority of systems and organs
> in living things function as a result of various independent parts
> working together, elimination or disabling of even one of which would
> be enough to disable the entire system or organ.
>
> For example, an ear perceives sounds only through a chain reaction of
> a series of smaller organs. Take out or deform one of these, e.g. one
> of the bones of the middle ear, and there would be no hearing
> whatsoever. In order for an ear to perceive a variety of components
> such as auditory meatus, malleous, incus and stapes bones, tympanic
> membrane, cochlea and fluid, sensory cells, vibration sensor
> extensions of these cells, net of nerves that connect to brain and
> hearing center in the brain have to work together without exception.
>
> The system could not have developed in segments because none of the
> segments could possibly function alone at all.
>
> Hence the concept of irreducible complexity demolishes the theory of
> evolution from its foundations. What is really interesting is the fact
> that Darwin also worried about these very prospects. He wrote in On
> The Origin of Species:
>
> "If the impossibility of formation of a complex organ through a series
> of small changes was ever to be proven my theory would have certainly
> collapsed. However I could not find such an organ..." (Charles Darwin,
> The Origin of Species: A Facsimile of the First Edition, Harvard
> University Press, 1964, page 189.)
>
> Darwin could not or might not have wanted to find such an organ at the
> premature levels of 19th century science. However the science of 20th
> century did study the nature down to minute details and proved that
> majority of living structures embody irreducible complexity.
> Therefore, Darwin's theory has most "certainly collapsed" just as he
> feared.
>
> As we examine the living beings we will not only see an immense error
> Darwinism makes but also witness the greatness of wisdom that
> these systems were created with. These mechanisms will be found
> anywhere from the wings of a bird to inside a bat's skull. Hence we
> will see the indisputable evidences of God's creation without error.
> Likewise, the power and faculty of God to create without error is
> expressed in a surah of Qur'an as follows:
>
> "He is God - the Creator, the Maker, the Giver of Form. To Him belong
> the Most Beautiful Names. Everything in the heavens and earth
> glorifies Him. He is the Almighty, the All-Wise." (Qur'an, Al-Hashr,
> 59:24)
>
> http://www.harunyahya.com/