On Jul 12, 11:59 am, T-minus108 gmail.com> wrote:

Such a shift was brilliantly depicted in the movie, Carl Sagan's
"Contact".

What was so insightful, was the way the writer 'kidded' everybody into
believing this was the result of world wide engineering feat. The
similarity being that many 'visionaries' have misinterpreted such
events as described in the above article, Cayce being one example.
That such experiences are a result of some cataclysmic event.

Dimensions dont change. It is the individual that 'shifts' from
dimension to dimension, in a state of consciousness.
Think of the 'psychedelic' experiences reported by drug takers.

"Picture Yourself On A Boat On A River With Tangerine Fields And
Marshmallow Skies"...I rest my Cayce :-)

The comment re 'bananas appearing at will' is also linked to the why
'visionaries' of the so called 'gods' depict them as appearing to have
magnificent physiques, and why many are inspired to emulate.Why look
like Pee Wee Herman, when a "Steve Reeves" shape is just a wish away.
Also the basis of the adage 'be careful what you wish for'.Many
problems are caused by wishing for something from another dimension.

Its OK to "Dream Of Jeanie" ....(showing my age here !!!)

In the case of physiques that also illustrates the role of tissue
drugs in such attempts, which, like their psychotropic counterparts
also have a 'hell' of a price. This is also the basis of 'roid
rage'.Connecting to more 'psychic power without the discipline...the
mind/body connection.

Many experience such shifts naturally, and try to tell of their
experiences to the uninitiated, with predictable results. All
religions begin with this phenomenon so if you wish to share such
experiences, you need to learn to defend yourself, or its off to K
Martyre.

If you were brought up with Christian stories, it is a great
revelation to reread with this level of understanding. So much more
makes sense.

The last time such 'events' were expected with some semblance of
rationality, was the planetary line up late last century.
Back then, I was wondering if 'down under' would take its natural
position of 'up over ' :-), which also seemed correct, until I realise
that over and under were just mental constructs !!

Its all about consciousness.

BOfL