Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: s.j.lagoes.j.lagoe Date: Sep 18, 2008 06:24
On Sep 18, 1:57Â pm, Josip Almasi vrspace.org> wrote:>> Below is a dialogue arguing that traditionals view of objects,
>> endurance, perdurance in philosophy and logic are incorrect. I would
>> be interested to hear your comments, whether you see flaws in its
>> argument or what the extensions of it may be. Sigmund.
>
> Extensions are pointing to flaws.
> Like JJ said, it was clay all the time, but it's changing properties
> (attributes).
Sure, but a statue can be repaired when it becomes damaged resulting
in the same statue but with different material composition. Then of
course it is the statue that's properties have changed. There is
nothing special about the clays objecthood compared to the figures
objecthood - they are both valid things right, and the both "exist"?
> This may be nice intro story for dialectic reasoning:)
> Relation of subject and object and attributing attributes to objects etc.
>
> Regards...
| 
