i checked the critiques
kant is not from china
it's clearly tibet
nietzsches really got to get his chinese provinces straight if he's
gonna go climbing mountains all day

On Sep 21, 8:01 pm, liezard mail.com> wrote:

wait, isn't koenigsberg a mountain?
don't know, don't care
one mountain climb is as good as any other
the point is that you see from the bird's eye view isn't it
satellite in the sky
you trick my eye
i think you are a star
but really just a microwave that can fly
can you check if koenigsberg is a mountain for me
O, satellite in the sky

On Sep 21, 8:07 pm, liezard mail.com> wrote:

On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 20:22:43 -0700, Immortalist
yahoo.com> wrote:

On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:11:35 -0700, Malrassic Park gmail.com>
wrote:

Kant was not from Germany, but from Prussia.
He was from Konigsburg, which was in Prussia during his life and it
lies, now between Poland and Lithuania.

On Sep 22, 4:07 am, liezard mail.com> wrote:

On Sep 22, 12:08 am, chazwin yahoo.com> wrote:

Oh ya, forgot, thanx.

Rather than straying into a discussion of the many implications of the
hierarchical relations in Kant's System, we could now identify Kant as
a Westerner with some distinctively "Chinese" characteristics and
tendencies, lending qualified approval to Nietzsche's reference to
Kant as the "Chinaman of Konigsberg". Clearly, we have not found
enough evidence to merit the conclusion that Kant had a Chinese
personality in any overly literal sense. His influence on Western
thought and culture has been far too strong to make that plausible.
But we have sufficient reason to conclude that Kant stood on the
borderline between these two ideals: something of a synthesis of the
generalized, and perhaps to some extent fictional, conceptions of the
typical "Chinese" and "Western" personality types.

"chazwin" yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1190444977.483591.105740@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...

On Sep 24, 5:55 pm, "Tim" qwerty.com> wrote: