|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: ibshambatibshambat Date: Jun 29, 2008 05:01
What many people do not understand about clean energy is that it is a
major economic boon to any country that would embrace it. The clean
energy technologies - wind power, solar power, coal sequestration,
hydrogen engines, sun-beam technology - are all brain-intensive,
technology-intensive industries. Which means that they will directly
create millions of jobs - engineering and technology jobs to develop
the technologies, and manufacturing and construction jobs to put them
in place. And that will be an effective way to put back to work the
parts of America that have taken a hit from displacement of industry
to other countries.
It is also a way to wrest the world free of the stranglehold exercised
by oil-funded fundamentalists in Texas, Oklahoma, Iran and Saudi
Arabia, as well as dictators in Venezuela, Lybia and Kazakhstan. With
energy production no longer under control of oppressors, there are
stronger economical foundations for liberty in all of the world,
including in what is known as the free world. With vital resources not
under control of despots and fundamentalists, there is less change of
free world being sabotaged, as it has been sabotaged by Texas Oil's
puppet regime.
|
| Show full article (6.11Kb) |
|
| | 9 Comments |
|
|
Author: Arindam BanerjeeArindam Banerjee Date: Jun 29, 2008 05:57
Very good. The best way to save the planet and lead great live is to create
not just clean energy but pure water as well from the the Hydrogen
Transmission Network.
Details at:
www.users.bigpond.com/adda1234/HP.htm
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ef6da406-4816-4e1c-9d17-a41adfd91955@r37g2000prm.googlegroups.com...> What many people do not understand about clean energy is that it is a
> major economic...
|
| Show full article (6.69Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Day BrownDay Brown Date: Jun 29, 2008 09:59
Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> Very good. The best way to save the planet and lead great live is to create
> not just clean energy but pure water as well from the the Hydrogen
> Transmission Network.
Americans, at least, are too stupid and neurotic to do that.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Democracy HighlanderDemocracy Highlander Date: Jun 29, 2008 16:32
Day Brown wrote:
> Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>> Very good. The best way to save the planet and lead great live is to
>> create not just clean energy but pure water as well from the the Hydrogen
>> Transmission Network.
> Americans, at least, are too stupid and neurotic to do that.
Americans, are not too stupid and neurotic to do that. At least not all of
them.
Unfortunate, they have no power to do as they want because the power has
been already hijacked by corporate and special interests whose interest is
against the interest of American people.
US politicians are dependent by corporate money, and corporations are
organized as pure dictatorships (non democratic entities).
As a result we got a extensions of the financial elites over politics, and
the politicians rule for the few elites not for the many. This is the
definition of a plutocracy.
|
| Show full article (1.60Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: BretCahillBretCahill Date: Jun 29, 2008 16:41
> What many people do not understand about clean energy is that it is a
> major economic boon to any country that would embrace it. The clean
> energy technologies - wind power, solar power, coal sequestration,
> hydrogen engines, sun-beam technology - are all brain-intensive,
> technology-intensive industries. Which means that they will directly
> create millions of jobs - engineering and technology jobs to develop
> the technologies, and manufacturing and construction jobs to put them
> in place. And that will be an effective way to put back to work the
> parts of America that have taken a hit from displacement of industry
> to other countries.
>
> It is also a way to wrest the world free of the stranglehold exercised
> by oil-funded fundamentalists in Texas, Oklahoma, Iran and Saudi
> Arabia, as well as dictators in Venezuela, Lybia and Kazakhstan. With
> energy production no longer under control of oppressors, there are
> stronger economical foundations for liberty in all of the world,
> including in what is known as the free world. With vital resources not
> under control of despots and fundamentalists, there is less change of
> free world being sabotaged, as it has been sabotaged by Texas Oil's
> puppet regime. ...
|
| Show full article (6.47Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ibshambat2004ibshambat2004 Date: Jun 30, 2008 04:22
On Jun 29, 10:57 pm, "Arindam Banerjee" bigpond.com> wrote:> Very good. The best way to save the planet and lead great live is to create
> not just clean energy but pure water as well from the the Hydrogen
> Transmission Network.
>
> Details at:
>
> www.users.bigpond.com/adda1234/HP.htm
Excellent work. I have written about desalination of ocean water and
both using it to meet water needs of Australian metropolitan areas and
sending it through a network of canals into the inner Australia to
make desert bloom, but this is even better idea.
Does the Rudd government have a copy of this?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: The TruckerThe Trucker Date: Jun 30, 2008 09:06
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 04:22:30 -0700, ibshambat2004 wrote:
I am being jerked around. This paper says that the creation of hydrogen
is more energy intensive than the use of it. The problem appears to be
the usual tobacco company scientist approach to government. The oil
companies are paying big money to anyone who can present some sort of
scientific looking paper that will debunk electrolysis as a means to
create HHO that will then burn in an internal combustion engine and
produce the power needed to move a vehicle. The claim seems to be that
the power needed to run the electrolysis is more than the energy boost
that you get from the HHO. Sorry, Mr. Tobacco Company Scientist. The
stuff seems to work in spite of your proclamations.
Then we have crap like this article that says the objective is some wild
ass green revolution to change the dessert into a garden of Eden. I have
no objection to that happening at all. But it ain't on the front burner.
|
| Show full article (1.33Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Arindam BanerjeeArindam Banerjee Date: Jun 30, 2008 21:04
> On Jun 29, 10:57 pm, "Arindam Banerjee" bigpond.com> wrote:
>>> Very good. The best way to save the planet and lead great live is to create
>> not just clean energy but pure water as well from the the Hydrogen
>> Transmission Network.
>
>> Details at:
>
>
> Excellent work. I have written about desalination of ocean water and
> both using it to meet water needs of Australian metropolitan areas and
> sending it through a network of canals into the inner Australia to
> make desert bloom, but this is even better idea.
>
> Does the Rudd government have a copy of this?
Dear Ilya,
|
| Show full article (2.29Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Arindam BanerjeeArindam Banerjee Date: Jun 30, 2008 21:10
On Jul 1, 2:06 am, The Trucker verizon.net> wrote:> On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 04:22:30 -0700, ibshambat2004 wrote:
>
> I am being jerked around. This paper says that the creation of hydrogen
> is more energy intensive than the use of it.
Where???? What do you mean? Could you please quote from it.
The problem appears to be
> the usual tobacco company scientist approach to government. The oil
> companies are paying big money to anyone who can present some sort of
> scientific looking paper that will debunk electrolysis as a means to
> create HHO that will then burn in an internal combustion engine and
> produce the power needed to move a vehicle. The claim seems to be that
> the power needed to run the electrolysis is more than the energy boost
> that you get from the HHO. Sorry, Mr. Tobacco Company Scientist. The
> stuff seems to work in spite of your proclamations.
|
| Show full article (2.27Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Arindam BanerjeeArindam Banerjee Date: Jun 30, 2008 21:19
On Jun 30, 2:59 am, Day Brown daybrown.org> wrote:> Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>> Very good. The best way to save the planet and lead great live is to create
>> not just clean energy but pure water as well from the the Hydrogen
>> Transmission Network.
>
> Americans, at least, are too stupid and neurotic to do that.
> ---- Posted via Pronews.com - Premium Corporate Usenet News Provider ---- http://www.pronews.comoffers corporate packages that have access to 100,000+ newsgroups
This is very sad. I should like to think so much better of them, and
I feel that I am speaking of all those who were brought up in the
60-70s when to be anything American meant that you could anything.
Really, I do hope there is more to American goals and ideals today,
than being a half-ton human being.
Arindam Banerjee.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
