>Could Cayce actually be close to the Truth?

> Just for fun, out of left field.
>
> Neither a Bible preaching Christian, nor an Atheist, would have much
> interest in this interpretation.
>
> FROM: http://www.heartnsoul.com/revelation_explained.htm
>

>

>news:cRBak.16394$IK1.8447@news-server.bigpond.net.au...

>> Just for fun, out of left field.
>>
>> Neither a Bible preaching Christian, nor an Atheist, would have much
>> interest in this interpretation.
>>
>> FROM: http://www.heartnsoul.com/revelation_explained.htm
>>

>snip

>>

>This is a good interpretation of Revelations on a personal human level.
>But it is more likely is that Revelations is a pile of complete tosh and
>should be ignored.
>It is possible this John fellow was not a very nice person as indeed no
>humans are - and thus his own human nastiness manifest in Revelations.

> Just for fun, out of left field.
>
> Neither a Bible preaching Christian, nor an Athiest, would have much
> interest in this interpretation.
>
> FROM:http://www.heartnsoul.com/revelation_explained.htm
>
> The final book of the Bible is called the Book of Revelation. Written by a
> man named John (possibly John the Apostle) toward the end of his life, he
> records a vision he experiences, probably while dreaming or meditating. This
> vision contains a tremendous amount of symbolism; the same kind of symbolism
> one would see in a dream, a vision of the spirit world. In fact, the Book of
> Revelation contains the same symbolism found in the symbols in the Prophet
> Daniel's dream. All Biblical dreams, such as those of Joseph, Gideon,
> Daniel, Paul, and Peter, are very symbolic and therefore had a hidden
> spiritual meaning rather than a literal interpretation of the symbols. Such
> is the case with the Book of Revelation.
> Edgar Cayce was a Sunday School teacher who had many near-death experiences.
> As a result of these experiences, he was able to unlock the secrets to the ...