>The life-type which produced us might be considered a success. Some
>considerable number of species have honed survival strategies that
>preserved the lineage for countless generations. Thus, when a creature...

> On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 12:45:25 -0700 (PDT), Joseph Humming
>
>
>
>
>
> humanisation.org> wrote:

>>The life-type which produced us might be considered a success. Some
>>considerable number of species have honed survival strategies that
>>preserved the lineage for countless generations. Thus, when a creature
>>finally hoved into view - us - that is capable of delineating the
>>entire life-process and the context in which it operates we might
>>expect this creature to fashion an existence that transcends the
>>relentless application of learned or ingrained behaviour - e.g. the
>>learned or ingrained utilisation of particular sources of nourishment
>>- that characterises all other creatures.

>

>>Why - in parenthesis - should we expect this? Because the skills
>>fashioned by nature - the speed, strength, ferocity, hearing, seeing ...

> On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 12:45:25 -0700 (PDT), Joseph Humming
>
>
>
>
>
> humanisation.org> wrote:

>>The life-type which produced us might be considered a success. Some
>>considerable number of species have honed survival strategies that
>>preserved the lineage for countless generations. Thus, when a creature
>>finally hoved into view - us - that is capable of delineating the
>>entire life-process and the context in which it operates we might
>>expect this creature to fashion an existence that transcends the
>>relentless application of learned or ingrained behaviour - e.g. the
>>learned or ingrained utilisation of particular sources of nourishment
>>- that characterises all other creatures.

>

>>Why - in parenthesis - should we expect this? Because the skills
>>fashioned by nature - the speed, strength, ferocity, hearing, seeing ...

> On 3 jul, 22:43, raven1 nevermore.com> wrote:
>
>
>

>> On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 12:45:25 -0700 (PDT), Joseph Humming

>

>> humanisation.org> wrote:

>>>The life-type which produced us might be considered a success. Some
>>>considerable number of species have honed survival strategies that
>>>preserved the lineage for countless generations. Thus, when a creature
>>>finally hoved into view - us - that is capable of delineating the
>>>entire life-process and the context in which it operates we might
>>>expect this creature to fashion an existence that transcends the
>>>relentless application of learned or ingrained behaviour - e.g. the
>>>learned or ingrained utilisation of particular sources of nourishment
>>>- that characterises all other creatures.

>

>>>Why - in parenthesis - should we expect this? Because the skills
>>>fashioned by nature - the speed, strength, ferocity, hearing, seeing ...

>On 3 jul, 22:43, raven1 nevermore.com> wrote:

>> On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 12:45:25 -0700 (PDT), Joseph Humming
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> humanisation.org> wrote:

>>>The life-type which produced...

> The life-type which produced us might be considered a success. Some
> considerable number of species have honed survival strategies that
> preserved the lineage for countless generations. Thus, when a creature
> finally hoved into view - us - that is capable of delineating the
> entire life-process and the context in which it operates we might
> expect this creature to fashion an existence that transcends the
> relentless application of learned or ingrained behaviour - e.g. the
> learned or ingrained utilisation of particular sources of nourishment
> - that characterises all other creatures.
>
> Why - in parenthesis - should we expect this? Because the skills
> fashioned by nature - the speed, strength, ferocity, hearing, seeing
> etc...all of them based entirely on a chemical arrangement - are all
> somewhere in nature used to the full. The transfer or the utilisation
> of energy in, say, the cheetah or the eagle or the rhinocerous or the
> polar bear cannot be bested. So, if we possess the intelligence to
> construct a society that manages, or decreases as much as possible,
> the perils of existence we will eventually utilize that intelligence.
> ...

> On Jul 4, 5:45 am, Joseph Humming humanisation.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>

>> The life-type which produced us might be considered a success. Some
>> considerable number of species have honed survival strategies that
>> preserved the lineage for countless generations. Thus, when a creature
>> finally hoved into view - us - that is capable of delineating the
>> entire life-process and the context in which it operates we might
>> expect this creature to fashion an existence that transcends the
>> relentless application of learned or ingrained behaviour - e.g. the
>> learned or ingrained utilisation of particular sources of nourishment
>> - that characterises all other creatures.

>

>> Why - in parenthesis - should we expect this? Because the skills
>> fashioned by nature - the speed, strength, ferocity, hearing, seeing ...

> On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 12:45:25 -0700 (PDT), Joseph Humming
>
>
>
>
>
> humanisation.org> wrote:

>>The life-type which produced us might be considered a success. Some
>>considerable number of species have honed survival strategies that
>>preserved the lineage for countless generations. Thus, when a creature
>>finally hoved into view - us - that is capable of delineating the
>>entire life-process and the context in which it operates we might
>>expect this creature to fashion an existence that transcends the
>>relentless application of learned or ingrained behaviour - e.g. the
>>learned or ingrained utilisation of particular sources of nourishment
>>- that characterises all other creatures.

>

>>Why - in parenthesis - should we expect this? Because the skills
>>fashioned by nature - the speed, strength, ferocity, hearing, seeing ...

>On Jul 3, 9:43 pm, raven1 nevermore.com> wrote:

>> On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 12:45:25 -0700 (PDT), Joseph Humming
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> humanisation.org> wrote:

>>>The life-type which produced...