|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: SannySanny Date: Aug 28, 2008 08:44
What is the proof the Mass is always conserved?
Its just happens that mass do not get destroyed or created. But it can
never happen how that can be said?
People say Quantum effect a mass can travel to another time domain.
People say time travel is possible. Then the mass which vanishes from
our time. that is gone for ever. Then Mass is not conserved?
I am new to this topic, so speak in simple language.
Bye
Sanny
|
| |
|
| | 45 Comments |
|
|
Author: Y.PoratY.Porat Date: Aug 28, 2008 08:51
On Aug 28, 6:44 pm, Sanny hotmail.com> wrote:> What is the proof the Mass is always conserved?
>
> Its just happens that mass do not get destroyed or created. But it can
> never happen how that can be said?
>
> People say Quantum effect a mass can travel to another time domain.
>
> People say time travel is possible. Then the mass which vanishes from
> our time. that is gone for ever. Then Mass is not conserved?
>
> I am new to this topic, so speak in simple language.
>
> Bye
> Sanny
-------------------
it i s proved by experimental facts!!
|
| Show full article (0.61Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: SpacemanSpaceman Date: Aug 28, 2008 08:53
Sanny wrote:
> What is the proof the Mass is always conserved?
>
> Its just happens that mass do not get destroyed or created. But it can
> never happen how that can be said?
>
> People say Quantum effect a mass can travel to another time domain.
Those people are ignorant to how clocks work and what the standards
of time and distance measurement are.
> People say time travel is possible. Then the mass which vanishes from
> our time. that is gone for ever. Then Mass is not conserved?
Those people are the same ignorant people as the above.
:)
> I am new to this topic, so speak in simple language.
Don't worry about those people, they are lost in rubber ruler
and malfunctioning clock land, they are no longer practicing
science.
:)
|
| Show full article (0.83Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: JackJack Date: Aug 28, 2008 08:56
> What is the proof the Mass is always conserved?
>
I don't know. But is mass conserved in nuclear fission?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: SannySanny Date: Aug 28, 2008 09:01
>> What is the proof the Mass is always conserved?
>
> I don't know. But is mass conserved in nuclear fission?
In Nuclear Fusion Mass is converted into energy.
E= m* c^2;
I think this do not violate that principle of Conservation of Mass?
Bye
Sanny
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: dlzcdlzc Date: Aug 28, 2008 09:14
Dear Sanny:
On Aug 28, 8:44 am, Sanny hotmail.com> wrote:> What is the proof the Mass is always
> conserved?
There is no such proof. An energetic photon can create two or more
massive particles.
> Its just happens that mass do not
> get destroyed or created.
It does get destroyed. Matter and antimatter yield massless resultant
particles.
> But it can never happen how that can
> be said?
"Energy is conserved" used to be good as a local approximation.
Probably still is.
> People say Quantum effect a mass can
> travel to another time domain.
What people?
|
| Show full article (1.15Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: TimberwoofTimberwoof Date: Aug 28, 2008 09:35
In article
i24g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
Sanny hotmail.com> wrote:
> What is the proof the Mass is always conserved?
There is no "proof", but beginning with Lavoisier, a French tax
collector who applied strict principles of accounting to his
observations of chemical reactions, the observationthat under ordinary
conditions, mass is neither created nor destroyed, has always been
confirmed.
> Its just happens that mass do not get destroyed or created. But it can
> never happen how that can be said?
Why don't you read up on how the Law of Conservation of Mass was
formulated. REading about the history of science will help you
understand terms like "scientific law".
|
| Show full article (1.36Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Y.PoratY.Porat Date: Aug 28, 2008 20:43
On Aug 29, 2:44 am, Igor excite.com> wrote:> On Aug 28, 11:44 am, Sanny hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> What is the proof the Mass is always conserved?
>
>> Its just happens that mass do not get destroyed or created. But it can
>> never happen how that can be said?
>
>> People say Quantum effect a mass can travel to another time domain.
>
>> People say time travel is possible. Then the mass which vanishes from
>> our time. that is gone for ever. Then Mass is not conserved?
>
>> I am new to this topic, so speak in simple language.
>
>> Bye
>> Sanny
>
> How very nineteenth century of you. The concept of conservation of
> mass was disproved a long time ago. ...
|
| Show full article (0.91Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Y.PoratY.Porat Date: Aug 28, 2008 20:46
On Aug 28, 11:19 pm, PD gmail.com> wrote:> On Aug 28, 10:44 am, Sanny hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> What is the proof the Mass is always conserved?
>
> It's not. Where did you read that it was?
>
> ----------------------
Y.Porat proved it
by proving ** that energy has mass!!**
---------------
Y.Porat
---------------------
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Koobee WubleeKoobee Wublee Date: Aug 28, 2008 22:42
On Aug 28, 12:03 pm, Tom Roberts wrote:
> Sanny wrote:
>> What is the proof the Mass is always conserved?
>
> There can be no such proof, because mass is quite clearly not conserved
> for many known situations.
It depends on how you interpret the mass to be.
> Under certain general circumstances, energy is conserved, and momentum
> is conserved, and angular momentum is conserved, but not mass.
The conservation of energy is very much in the bag according to the
Noether’s theorem. However, the conservation of the angular momentum
is not a sure thing especially in a binary system.
|
| Show full article (6.50Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
