|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: C3C3 Date: Jun 18, 2008 23:33
Do you think there is such a thing as telepathy? There is ample
evidence of this if not proof. Not that every thought is readable.
What does this deem us for the human race? Are we better off with or
without telepathy?
C3
|
| |
|
| | 19 Comments |
|
|
Author: Mark EarnestMark Earnest Date: Jun 19, 2008 00:36
> Do you think there is such a thing as telepathy? There is ample
> evidence of this if not proof. Not that every thought is readable.
> What does this deem us for the human race? Are we better off with or
> without telepathy?
Do you really think that we cogniscize this black light we are reading right
now, across a whitened background?
No.
We are reading each other's minds.
I am telepathic. You are telepathic. We are all telepathic. That is where
we are all going right now, anyway.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Leon HoeneveldLeon Hoeneveld Date: Jun 19, 2008 00:46
C3 schreef:
> Do you think there is such a thing as telepathy? There is ample
> evidence of this if not proof. Not that every thought is readable.
> What does this deem us for the human race? Are we better off with or
> without telepathy?
>
> C3
I think telepathy is a wrong concept. You have simultaneity and tuning.
It's not like "reading", it's a "becoming". In alternative terms "soul-.
or mind-sharing".
The fear that you can have when you believe your mind can be read can be
big.
The misconception there is that someone might misuse the information or
know what you really think. Apart from other possibilities to know that
anyhow, the fear is unappropriate because with "becoming" another there
is also understanding, comprehension of the other. Without understanding
"mind-sharing" would not be possible. And anyone can lear to understand
each other.
|
| Show full article (1.34Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: zinniczinnic Date: Jun 19, 2008 12:49
On Jun 19, 2:46 am, Leon Hoeneveld
wrote:
> C3 schreef:> Do you think there is such a thing as telepathy? There is ample
>> evidence of this if not proof. Not that every thought is readable.
>> What does this deem us for the human race? Are we better off with or
>> without telepathy?
>
>> C3
>
> I think telepathy is a wrong concept. You have simultaneity and tuning.
> It's not like "reading", it's a "becoming". In alternative terms "soul-.
> or mind-sharing".
>
> The fear that you can have when you believe your mind can be read can be
> big.
> The misconception there is that someone might misuse the information or
> know what you really think. Apart from other possibilities to know that
> anyhow, the fear is unappropriate because with "becoming" another there
> is also understanding, comprehension of the other. Without understanding
> "mind-sharing" would not be possible. And anyone can lear to understand ...
|
| Show full article (1.79Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Leon HoeneveldLeon Hoeneveld Date: Jun 19, 2008 13:29
zinnic schreef:
> On Jun 19, 2:46 am, Leon Hoeneveld
> wrote:
>> C3 schreef:> Do you think there is such a thing as telepathy? There is ample
>>> evidence of this if not proof. Not that every thought is readable.
>>> What does this deem us for the human race? Are we better off with or
>>> without telepathy?
>>> C3
>> I think telepathy is a wrong concept. You have simultaneity and tuning.
>> It's not like "reading", it's a "becoming". In alternative terms "soul-.
>> or mind-sharing".
>>
>> The fear that you can have when you believe your mind can be read can be
>> big.
>> The misconception there is that someone might misuse the information or
>> know what you really think. Apart from other possibilities to know that
>> anyhow, the fear is unappropriate because with "becoming" another there
>> is also understanding, comprehension of the other. Without understanding
>> "mind-sharing" would not be possible. And anyone can lear to understand
>> each other. ...
|
| Show full article (3.22Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ImmortalistImmortalist Date: Jun 19, 2008 17:45
On Jun 18, 11:33 pm, C3 aol.com> wrote:> Do you think there is such a thing as telepathy? There is ample
> evidence of this if not proof. Not that every thought is readable.
> What does this deem us for the human race? Are we better off with or
> without telepathy?
>
> C3
I don't know, since you have not defined it and described how it might
work. Any explanation or example I have seen can be explained as some
sort of coincidence, lucky guess, planned guess, or some just-so
story;
A just-so story, also called the Ad hoc fallacy, is a term used in
academic anthropology, biological sciences, and social sciences. It
describes an unverifiable and unfalsifiable narrative explanation for
a cultural practice or a biological trait or behavior of humans or
other animals. The use of the term is an implicit criticism that
reminds the hearer of the essentially fictional and unprovable nature
of such an explanation. Such tales are common in folklore and
mythology (where they are known as etiological myths — see etiology).
|
| Show full article (3.01Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ImmortalistImmortalist Date: Jun 19, 2008 17:49
On Jun 19, 12:49 pm, zinnic gate.net> wrote:> On Jun 19, 2:46 am, Leon Hoeneveld
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> C3 schreef:> Do you think there is such a thing as telepathy? There is ample
>>> evidence of this if not proof. Not that every thought is readable.
>>> What does this deem us for the human race? Are we better off with or
>>> without telepathy?
>
>>> C3
>
>> I think telepathy is a wrong concept. You have simultaneity and tuning.
>> It's not like "reading", it's a "becoming". In alternative terms "soul-.
>> or mind-sharing".
>
>> The fear that you can have when you believe your mind can be read can be
>> big.
>> The misconception there is that someone might misuse the information or ...
|
| Show full article (4.82Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: THE BORGTHE BORG Date: Jun 19, 2008 19:32
>> Do you think there is such a thing as telepathy? There is ample
>> evidence of this if not proof. Not that every thought is readable.
>> What does this deem us for the human race? Are we better off with or
>> without telepathy?
>
> Do you really think that we cogniscize this black light we are reading
> right now, across a whitened background?
> No.
> We are reading each other's minds.
> I am telepathic. You are telepathic. We are all telepathic. That is where
> we are all going right now, anyway.
>
When you have the power you can place thoughts into human heads.
You can place a song - and then the human thinks they thought of the song
and wrote it themselves. You can place ideas. You can place inventions. A ...
|
| Show full article (1.62Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Mark EarnestMark Earnest Date: Jun 19, 2008 20:13
"THE BORG" cubesobigyoucannotseeit.com> wrote in message
news:uEE6k.16775$NN3.5@newsfe08.ams2...>
> "Mark Earnest" yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:avqdnRWlILcfkcfVnZ2dnUVZ_sHinZ2d@posted.internetamerica...>>> Do you think there is such a thing as telepathy? There is ample
>>> evidence of this if not proof. Not that every thought is readable.
>>> What does this deem us for the human race? Are we better off with or
>>> without telepathy?
>>
>> Do you really think that we cogniscize this black light we are reading
>> right now, across a whitened background?
>> No.
>> We are reading each other's minds.
>> I am telepathic. You are telepathic. We are all telepathic. That is
>> where we are all going right now, anyway.
>> ...
|
| Show full article (1.87Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: zinniczinnic Date: Jun 19, 2008 20:57
On Jun 19, 9:32 pm, "THE BORG" cubesobigyoucannotseeit.com>
wrote:> "Mark Earnest" yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:avqdnRWlILcfkcfVnZ2dnUVZ_sHinZ2d@posted.internetamerica...
>>>> Do you think there is such a thing as telepathy? There is ample
>>> evidence of this if not proof. Not that every thought is readable.
>>> What does this deem us for the human race? Are we better off with or
>>> without telepathy?
>
>> Do you really think that we cogniscize this black light we are reading
>> right now, across a whitened background?
>> No.
>> We are reading each other's minds.
>> I am telepathic. You are telepathic. We are all telepathic. That is where
>> we are all going right now, anyway.
> ...
|
| Show full article (2.05Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
