|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: v4vijayakumarv4vijayakumar Date: Oct 23, 2006 00:38
God survives, therefore he is;
He is, He exists.
NB: No flames, just be reasonable.
|
| |
|
| | 12 Comments |
|
|
Author: mikegordgemikegordge Date: Oct 23, 2006 02:59
v4vijayakumar wrote:
> God survives,
For as long as man remains stupid.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: staretsenstaretsen Date: Oct 23, 2006 03:15
v4vijayakumar wrote:
> God survives, therefore he is;
> He is, He exists.
>
> NB: No flames, just be reasonable.
This is one of the reasons I can't really like philosophy, more
specificially philosophers. You have created a little system which
depends entirely on itself (here a misunderstanding of Darwin) and
attempts to disregard reality. If you try to be sceptical for just a
moment, you'll realise that something has to exist first, if it is to
survive.
|
| Show full article (1.04Kb) |
| 4 Comments |
|
|
Author: Roger JohanssonRoger Johansson Date: Oct 23, 2006 03:28
v4vijayakumar wrote:
> God survives, therefore he is;
> He is, He exists.
The leaders of bully gangs all over the world, and there are hundreds
of millions of them also survive, therefor they are. They are, they
exist.
God is no exception, on the contrary, he is their role model and
leader.
Superhumans, gods, superheros like the Hulk and Superman, gangsters
like Al Capone, Hitler, they all stand for a superhuman ideal, based on
violence and strong convictions.
Many songwriters and movie makers support this superhuman culture.
Stand up for your right, Bob Marley.
I'll make a stand. I won't break. Bryan Adams
"ONLY THE STRONG SURVIVE" by "BRYAN ADAMS"
I'll be the rock you can build on, ...
'Cause we could stand up to your test.
John Sebastian: Did You Ever Have To Make Up Your Mind?
|
| Show full article (2.38Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: tgtg Date: Oct 23, 2006 03:33
staretsen wrote:
> v4vijayakumar wrote:
>> God survives, therefore he is;
>> He is, He exists.
>>
>> NB: No flames, just be reasonable.
>
> This is one of the reasons I can't really like philosophy, more
> specificially philosophers. You have created a little system which
> depends entirely on itself (here a misunderstanding of Darwin) and
> attempts to disregard reality. If you try to be sceptical for just a
> moment, you'll realise that something has to exist first, if it is to
> survive.
>
> Darwinism states that of what lives, those which are strongest will
> survive, not that that the theoretical possibility of something
> surviving if it did exist - which God of course would do, assuming
> that he exists today - implies that it does. The very statement that
> "God survives" assumes that God exists, which if I am not mistaken was
> what you attempted to prove. Your argument is therefore a circular one, ...
|
| Show full article (1.35Kb) |
| 2 Comments |
|
|
Author: staretsenstaretsen Date: Oct 23, 2006 03:44
tg wrote:
> staretsen wrote:
>> v4vijayakumar wrote:
>>> God survives, therefore he is;
>>> He is, He exists.
>>>
>>> NB: No flames, just be reasonable.
>>
>> This is one of the reasons I can't really like philosophy, more
>> specificially philosophers. You have created a little system which
>> depends entirely on itself (here a misunderstanding of Darwin) and
>> attempts to disregard reality. If you try to be sceptical for just a
>> moment, you'll realise that something has to exist first, if it is to
>> survive.
>>
>> Darwinism states that of what lives, those which are strongest will
>> survive, not that that the theoretical possibility of something
>> surviving if it did exist - which God of course would do, assuming
>> that he exists today - implies that it does. The very statement that
>> "God survives" assumes that God exists, which if I am not mistaken was ...
|
| Show full article (2.33Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Daniel T.Daniel T. Date: Oct 23, 2006 04:17
"v4vijayakumar" gmail.com> wrote:
> God survives, therefore he is;
> He is, He exists.
What are you talking about? The above is meaningless to me.
--
There are two things that simply cannot be doubted, logic and perception.
Doubt those, and you no longer
|
| |
| 2 Comments |
|
|
Author: dschramadschrama Date: Oct 23, 2006 04:54
Daniel T. schreef:
> "v4vijayakumar" gmail.com> wrote:
>>> God survives, therefore he is;
>> He is, He exists.
>
> What are you talking about? The above is meaningless to me.
>
> --
> There are two things that simply cannot be doubted, logic and perception.
> Doubt those, and you no longer have anyone to discuss your doubts with,
> nor any ability to discuss them.
You can say you doubt, but use logic, this way discussion is still
possible despite the claim of doubting something.
|
| |
| 1 Comment |
|
|
Author: Neil CowardNeil Coward Date: Oct 23, 2006 05:10
Probably just a quibble but 'strongest' is misleading. Its those best fitted
to survive will survive. Most animals are stronger than man but their
survival is endangered by us.
"staretsen" gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1161598520.684966.255610@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...> v4vijayakumar wrote:
>> God survives, therefore he is;
>> He is, He exists...
|
| Show full article (1.39Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: DougCDougC Date: Oct 23, 2006 06:24
v4vijayakumar wrote:
> God survives, therefore he is;
> He is, He exists.
Do you mean that God has survived because he is the fittest? Are gods
subject to the laws of evolution?
>
> NB: No flames, just be reasonable.
OK. Your petitio principii is unreasonable. Or unreasoned. Which
brings into question whether you are capable of recognizing a
reasonable response.
Doug Chandler
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
