gmail.com> wrote in message
news:63d3afbc-bace-4b21-9495-fd81887af208@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 18, 9:23 pm, "Sean" now.com.au> wrote:
> "turtoni"
fastmail.net> wrote in message
>
> news:81d395a6-b282-4f15-a4ab-efc7f028a2b5@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
> On Sep 18, 2:21 pm, John Jones aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> turtoni wrote:
>>> A large study is to examine near-death experiences in cardiac arrest
>>> patients.
>
>>> Doctors at 25 UK and US hospitals will study 1,500 survivors to see if
>>> people with no heartbeat or brain activity can have "out of body"
>>> experiences.
>
>>> Some people report seeing a tunnel or bright light, others recall
>>> looking down from the ceiling at medical staff.
>
>>> The study, due to take three years and co-ordinated by Southampton
>>> University, will include placing on shelves images that could only be
>>> seen from above.
>
>>> To test this, the researchers have set up special shelving in
>>> resuscitation areas. The shelves hold pictures - but they're visible
>>> only from the ceiling.
>
>>> Dr Sam Parnia, who is heading the study, said: "If you can demonstrate
>>> that consciousness continues after the brain switches off, it allows
>>> for the possibility that the consciousness is a separate entity.
>
>>> "It is unlikely that we will find many cases where this happens, but
>>> we have to be open-minded.
>
>>> "And if no one sees the pictures, it shows these experiences are
>>> illusions or false memories.
>
>>> "This is a mystery that we can now subject to scientific study."
>
>>> Dr Parnia works as an intensive care doctor, and felt from his daily
>>> duties that science had not properly explored the issue of near-death
>>> experiences.
>
>>> He said: "Contrary to popular perception, death is not a specific
>>> moment.
>
>>> "It is a process that begins when the heart stops beating, the lungs
>>> stop working and the brain ceases functioning - a medical condition
>>> termed cardiac arrest.
>
>>> "During a cardiac arrest, all three criteria of death are present.
>>> There then follows a period of time, which may last from a few seconds
>>> to an hour or more, in which emergency medical efforts may succeed in
>>> restarting the heart and reversing the dying process.
>
>>> "What people experience during this period of cardiac arrest provides
>>> a unique window of understanding into what we are all likely to
>>> experience during the dying process."
>
>>> Dr Parnia and medical colleagues will analyse the brain activity of
>>> 1,500 cardiac arrest survivors, and see whether they can recall the
>>> images in the pictures.
>
>>> Hospitals involved include Addenbrookes in Cambridge, University
>>> Hospital in Birmingham and the Morriston in Swansea, as well as nine
>>> hospitals in the US.
>
>
>> Death experiences and out of body experiences were a common factor in
>> LSD therapy in the sixties. Grof has catalogued hundreds, if not
>> thousands of them.
>
>> But this evidence is ignored. Why? Because it doesn't fall into current
>> science practice. And why is that? Because Grof didn't run 'brain
>> scans'. You have to 'analyse' 'brain scans' these days to be seen as
>> doing proper science. That's how narrow-minded these new studies are.
>
> "Despite Grof's continued emphasis on the concept of "birth trauma" as
> a critical psychic experience, mainstream psychiatry has not accepted
> his concept (Grof, 1992). In fact, most professionals would argue that
> such a conceptualization of retained memory falls outside of the
> physiological potential of the newborn. "Despite the growing number of
> reports of memories of past lives, life in the womb, and the birth
> experience, there is no scientific evidence to substantiate these
> claims" (Mark L. Howe and Mary L. Courage, 2004; also see Spanos,
> 1996)."
>
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanislav_Grof-
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Sean:
> Great, so that locks that option out of the array of possibilites.
Not any more than Christianity or Islam are knocked
out of the realm of the possible by such means. The
array of possibilities would include any religious belief,
in theory.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sean:
Did you understand what I "meant"?
> Excellent. Well done. You win. You're right. Can't argue with that.
J.J. tried to say that such Grof's stuff about the OBE
were considered unscientific because they didn't involve
incredibly expensive machines that go "ping." Clearly
there is more to it than that.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Sean:
Well if there is, then Turtoni should spell it out, yes? Not just copy and
paste and irrelevant issue that just happens to include Grof's name, as if
to claim *that* of itself means anything of value, and relevant to what JJ
was positing?
Anyway, isn't the most important thing the actual truth or validity of
something, and not whether something fits the criteria of "scientific"?
thx