Re: Study into near-death experiences
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Study into near-death experiences         

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: Sean
Date: Sep 18, 2008 22:04

"turtoni" fastmail.net> wrote in message
news:014810be-a003-42ae-9f74-a0fca9a6e85f@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 19, 12:47 am, "Sean" now.com.au> wrote:
> "turtoni" fastmail.net> wrote in message
>
> news:525771ff-b457-4844-8a6c-67d87f60af52@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> On Sep 19, 12:23 am, "Sean" now.com.au> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> "turtoni" fastmail.net> wrote in message
>
>>news:81d395a6-b282-4f15-a4ab-efc7f028a2b5@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
>> On Sep 18, 2:21 pm, John Jones aol.com> wrote:
>
>>> turtoni wrote:
>>>> A large study is to examine near-death experiences in cardiac arrest
>>>> patients.
>
>>>> Doctors at 25 UK and US hospitals will study 1,500 survivors to see
>>>> if
>>>> people with no heartbeat or brain activity can have "out of body"
>>>> experiences.
>
>>>> Some people report seeing a tunnel or bright light, others recall
>>>> looking down from the ceiling at medical staff.
>
>>>> The study, due to take three years and co-ordinated by Southampton
>>>> University, will include placing on shelves images that could only
>>>> be
>>>> seen from above.
>
>>>> To test this, the researchers have set up special shelving in
>>>> resuscitation areas. The shelves hold pictures - but they're visible
>>>> only from the ceiling.
>
>>>> Dr Sam Parnia, who is heading the study, said: "If you can
>>>> demonstrate
>>>> that consciousness continues after the brain switches off, it allows
>>>> for the possibility that the consciousness is a separate entity.
>
>>>> "It is unlikely that we will find many cases where this happens, but
>>>> we have to be open-minded.
>
>>>> "And if no one sees the pictures, it shows these experiences are
>>>> illusions or false memories.
>
>>>> "This is a mystery that we can now subject to scientific study."
>
>>>> Dr Parnia works as an intensive care doctor, and felt from his daily
>>>> duties that science had not properly explored the issue of
>>>> near-death
>>>> experiences.
>
>>>> He said: "Contrary to popular perception, death is not a specific
>>>> moment.
>
>>>> "It is a process that begins when the heart stops beating, the lungs
>>>> stop working and the brain ceases functioning - a medical condition
>>>> termed cardiac arrest.
>
>>>> "During a cardiac arrest, all three criteria of death are present.
>>>> There then follows a period of time, which may last from a few
>>>> seconds
>>>> to an hour or more, in which emergency medical efforts may succeed
>>>> in
>>>> restarting the heart and reversing the dying process.
>
>>>> "What people experience during this period of cardiac arrest
>>>> provides
>>>> a unique window of understanding into what we are all likely to
>>>> experience during the dying process."
>
>>>> Dr Parnia and medical colleagues will analyse the brain activity of
>>>> 1,500 cardiac arrest survivors, and see whether they can recall the
>>>> images in the pictures.
>
>>>> Hospitals involved include Addenbrookes in Cambridge, University
>>>> Hospital in Birmingham and the Morriston in Swansea, as well as nine
>>>> hospitals in the US.
>
>
>>> Death experiences and out of body experiences were a common factor in
>>> LSD therapy in the sixties. Grof has catalogued hundreds, if not
>>> thousands of them.
>
>>> But this evidence is ignored. Why? Because it doesn't fall into
>>> current
>>> science practice. And why is that? Because Grof didn't run 'brain
>>> scans'. You have to 'analyse' 'brain scans' these days to be seen as
>>> doing proper science. That's how narrow-minded these new studies are.
>
>> "Despite Grof's continued emphasis on the concept of "birth trauma" as
>> a critical psychic experience, mainstream psychiatry has not accepted
>> his concept (Grof, 1992). In fact, most professionals would argue that
>> such a conceptualization of retained memory falls outside of the
>> physiological potential of the newborn. "Despite the growing number of
>> reports of memories of past lives, life in the womb, and the birth
>> experience, there is no scientific evidence to substantiate these
>> claims" (Mark L. Howe and Mary L. Courage, 2004; also see Spanos,
>> 1996)."
>
>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>> Sean:
>> Great, so that locks that option out of the array of possibilites.
>> Excellent. Well done. You win. You're right. Can't argue with that.
>
> Yes. For me, typically i imagine that "birth trauma"
> "conceptualization of retained memory falls outside of the
> physiological potential of the newborn."
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Sean:
>
> So you can imagine. Great.
>
> That has what to do with LSD or the post you replied to with a short hand
> copy paste from wiki? Answser: Zip.
>
> Which came first .... wiki, or your imagination? The chicken or the egg?
> Are
> the Platonic solids mystical or scientific? Was Pythagorus a mystic, a
> philosopher, a musician, a health practitioner or a scientist?
>
> Are you able to even tell the difference Turtoni ..... without using wiki,
> that is. Not that there's anything wrong with Wiki, I quite like it. :-)
>
> An anagram (Greek anagramma 'letters written anew', passive participle of
> ana- 'again' + gramma 'letter') is a type of word play, the result of
> rearranging the letters of a word or phrase to produce a new word or
> phrase,
> using all the original letters exactly once; e.g., Eleven plus two =
> Twelve
> plus one, A decimal point = I'm a dot in place, Astronomers = Moon
> starers.
> Someone who creates anagrams is called an anagrammatist.[1] The original
> word or phrase is known as the subject of the anagram.
>
> Technically, any word or phrase that exactly reproduces the letters in
> another is an anagram; e.g., silent = listen
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anagram
>
> Your homework is to look up "chiastic aphorism" and write a 250 word
> commentary on it's use in the advertising & PR industries for your own
> benefit.
>
> TY.

Your homework is to undertsand that i should be the one setting you
the homework.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sean:
And that's where your major error in logic and reason lays my friend.

The chick doesn't teach the eagle how to fly.

Because the eagle knows all he has to do, is kick the chick out of the nest,
and the chick doesn't have a choice. It never really did, but only thought
it did. That's self-delusion.

The reverse however is not true, which is why the analogy is so full of
truth. So ends this lesson in reason and logic and philosophy, and the true
value of stories and analogies. So much is said with so few words, it must
be a miracle of the Gods.
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!

RELATED THREADS
SubjectArticles qty Group
Re: Near Death experience from an atheistalt.atheism ·