> supermann wrote:

> [snip]

> (Ignoring the advice not to respond to you)

> C'mon! The system lords are an evil, corrupt regime. They are cruel to
> their enemies and keep their subjects under their collective boot.
> Killing Ra was the best thing that could happen to the people of
> Abodos. The O'Neil character in the movie was following orders. Go see
> if their is a threat, use the nuke if you find one. A better order
> might have been: if you find a threat, come back and we'll rebury the
> gate. Of course, that would not have made for an exciting climax to the
> movie. Instead of using the rings to send the bomb to Ra's ship, O'Neil
> and Co. come back and assign a bunch of privates the job of digging a hole.

> supermann yahoo.com> wrote:

>> OK, this guy's fucked up on something...will somebody tell me what the
>> hell he's talking about? What does he mean by "ascended"?

> Might I recommend you actually WATCH the show?
> You might begin to have a CLUE then.

>
> I am the descendant of africans whose continent was over-run by
> Col. Jack O'Niells, by the boatloads, over the pass three
> centuries....so what I saw in Stargate came as little ontological
> surprise to me. Sometimes an animal can't help but reveal itself.

> So I ask you again, "What did O'Niel do on Abbydos that you
> consider "legal"?

> also sprach supermann...
>
> Welcome to the existential nightmare that is known to most as
> STARGATE. Stargate was a PG-13 sci-fi epic that was released in the
> summer of 1994 to lack-luster reviews, but some popular acclaim. The
> many critics that panned this film concentrated on what they believed
> were plotholes and sub-standard creative abilities on the part of the
> script. Stargate, they belived, was a badly written story, and with
> their strict time restraints in viewing new releases, the critics
> were
> forced(?) to move on to the next lemon without giving Stargate a more
> careful look. The general audience did more or less the same. That
> had
> turned out to be an earth-shattering mistake.
> The official synopsis is as follows: A discredited Egyptologist,
> Daniel Jackson (played by James Spader), decyphers the function of an
> ancient mechanical portal, long buried in the sands of Giza. Upon
> which, the air force dispatches a team of "military specialists" to
> utilize the portal to transport themselves halfway across the ...

> On Jun 25, 4:37 pm, boris badenov yahoo.com> wrote:
>

>> also sprachsupermann...

>

>>  Welcome to the existential nightmare that is known to most as
>>STARGATE.Stargatewas a PG-13 sci-fi epic that was released in the
>> summer of 1994 to lack-luster reviews, but some popular acclaim. The
>> many critics that panned this film concentrated on what they believed
>> were plotholes and sub-standard creative abilities on the part of the
>> script.Stargate, they belived, was a badly written story, and with
>> their strict time restraints in viewing new releases, the critics
>> were
>> forced(?) to move on to the next lemon without givingStargatea more
>> careful look. The general audience did more or less the same. That
>> had
>> turned out to be an earth-shattering mistake.
>>   The official synopsis is as follows: A discredited Egyptologist,
>> Daniel Jackson (played by James Spader), decyphers the function of an
>> ancient mechanical portal, long buried in the sands of Giza. Upon ...

> You, sir, are a gentleman. I have been at my wits end about the
> greater implications of being able to produce a film as socially
> destructive as this and not have its underlying sentiments rise to the
> level of cognacy in the audience. My biggest problem is whom I had
> chose to argue this point with. Those mindless snots over at
> "alt.tv.stargate-sg1"

> spelling abilities. Indeed, it was their over-reliance on their
> "apologetics" that tipped me off that they're something other than
> simple fans of the tv show.
> You may find some of their arguements entertaining. I am all but
> done with them...

> On Jun 25, 6:07 pm, Citizen Jimserac gmail.com> wrote:
>

>> On Jun 25, 4:37 pm, boris badenov yahoo.com> wrote:

>

>>> also sprachsupermann...

>

>>> Welcome to the existential nightmare that is known to most as
>>>STARGATE.Stargate was a PG-13 sci-fi epic that was released in the
>>> summer of 1994 to lack-luster reviews, but some popular acclaim. The
>>> many critics that panned this film concentrated on what they believed
>>> were plotholes and sub-standard creative abilities on the part of the
>>> script. Stargate , they belived, was a badly written story, and with
>>> their strict time restraints in viewing new releases, the critics
>>> were
>>> forced(?) to move on to the next lemon without giving Stargate a more
>>> careful look. The general audience did more or less the same. That
>>> had
>>> turned out to be an earth-shattering mistake.
>>> The official synopsis is as follows: A discredited Egyptologist, ...