Re: Spiritually Uplifting Musings for Tooly
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Spiritually Uplifting Musings for Tooly         

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: tooly
Date: Aug 4, 2008 03:53

"Sir Frederick" fuzzysys.com> wrote in message
news:iaic949tjugt1tule98l2p4k8v265qdlh3@4ax.com...
> Spiritually uplifting musings for Tooly,
> or anyone :
>
> By a blogger(not me) :
> http://newgreatbooks.blogspot.com/2008/07/spiritually-uplifting-story-learning-to...
> Tuesday, July 29, 2008
> A Spiritually Uplifting Story: Learning to Trust in Something More
>
> The Harry Potter series by J.K. Rowling is one of the most successful in
> modern
> times. With over 121.5 million copies in print, it is almost impossible to
> find
> someone who has not read the books. If you do, they probably have some
> argument
> about how they are "above" the books; they were written for young adults
> anyways. But what do you do when you are not allowed to read the books for
> religious or moral reasons? Is there really something bad contained within
> the
> books that would make them forbidden on some families reading lists? The
> recent
> book by author Donald James Parker brings up this intriguing question:
> Reforming
> the Potter's Clay.
>
> Introducing us to the Morales family, Parker carries us through the
> process of
> spiritual and moral discovery as EJ and Pedro read the tale of Harry
> Potter and
> the Sorcerers Stone. As they do, they begin to question the simple logic
> of good
> and evil that has been presented to them.
>
> "Ok, gang, let's review. What bad things did we find in this book?" Sal
> asked.
>
> "Dudley, the Malfoys, Voldemort, Uncle Vernon, and Professor Quirrell," EJ
> said.
>
> "And Professor Snape and vomit-flavored beans," Pedro added.
>
> "Wait. Those are bad guys. except for the beans. Any interesting book is
> going
> to have bad and good guys."
>
> "Right," EJ said. "So Harry and his friends are the good guys. They were
> fighting against evil. The magic they used was for good and not to hurt
> good
> people."
>
> .

Reuters started a precedent in their desire to be objective to call
terrorists 'insurgents'. Now all the news agencies use that term of
NON-ALIGNMENT.

Another example is that illegal immigrants have now been relabeled in our
news as 'undocumented workers'. Another example of objectivity taken to the
point of NON-Alignment. There are many examples today.

In WWII, if our news agencies had existed with today's sensibilities, nazi
atrocities would have been reported without explaining the evil. We
started to see this non-alignment starting perhaps with Viet Nam where all
too often we were made out to be the bad guys. Mind you, I'm sure both
good and bad existed on all sides, but when Hollywood lambasts the masses
with stories of GI's raping and killing and burning the villages of
innocents...the horrors of war come home to roost like an Oliver Stone
exaggeration of truth.

There is a way of telling the Harry Potter stories that makes Harry and
friends to be the bad side and Voldemort a misunderstood saint.

That same non-alignment has gravitated now to the Democratic Party in the
USA and has undermined nearly all support by the institutions of the guys
who wear the white hats...and our culture goes south, for now, it is said,
there are no white hats, but only grey hats worn by everyone. And Christ is
pissed upon and Machievelli taught to all good CEO's while the devil himself
rises as a force in our hearts.

We cannot weather this world standing 'non-aligned' as science and the
rational mind would force upon us. I just heard a sermon that said that
among any two things, there is always a better and worse, a good and a bad,
and it takes wisdom to know the difference, no matter how slight.
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!